Kurnal
Without going off on one, it was the good doctor and myself who did the cable tests at BICC warrington which added to the issue surrounding the cable changes to BS 5839, 2002.
We were angling for enhanced to be pyro only, for a variety of reasons including the cable clip issue. Pyro can be sufficiently supported by resting on support walls and ceiling grid. In a high temp fire test, soft skin cables rapidly expand in diameter to resemble cylindrical cigar ash. When unsupported (in our tests, just to protect the innocent) they failed to perform. When firmly clipped with metal clips this whole fragile structure remains for a duration of time, acting as an insulator both inter-conductor and to earth (if present) If the clip failed or was not present, the 'cigar ash' fell away and you had a short circuit ( the cable does not break which is the point of all this claptrap ) please dont add water or mechnical movement children or we will be here forever.
This is a very short 'jist' of some very long and detailed testing and represents my personal views & recollection only.
In short, if you lay the cable 'on' tray it is supported along its entire length and plastic clips are fine. If you clip it to a vertical tray or to the underside of a metal tray you should use metal clips spaced in accordance with the manufacturers instructions. This may answer your IT room situation. You could allways use pyro, which is a cable designed to do a job, not a cable designed to pass a test
Dave