Author Topic: Flashing beacons and DDA  (Read 10825 times)

Offline David Rooney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
    • http://ctafire.co.uk
Flashing beacons and DDA
« on: July 22, 2011, 11:17:05 AM »
When asked "do I NEED flashing beacons" throughout a building our stock answer is generally "it all depends on your risk assessment and your procedures etc. Beacons may be one part of a solution.

Is this right? Can anyone point me to a clause that we can quote within the DDA?

Are we still ok to suggest limited beacons in areas where hearing impaired may be stationed or should we really say "everywhere" on the basis they may move about!?

Part M re sleeping accommodation

 4.24d. "all bedrooms to have a visual fire alarm signal ..............."

Is this really necessary and should it be applied to hotels/ hostels / bedsits etc or is it reasonable to install in "20%" of bedrooms for example.

and

5.3 g. relating to sanitary accommodation states that “any fire alarm emits a visual and audible signal to warn occupants with hearing or visual impairments.”

Do we take this to mean sounders/beacons should be installed in every WC even if alarm levels are adequate from sounders installed outside the WC?

Thanks

CTA Fire - BAFE SP203 - F Gas Accredited - Wireless Fire Alarm System Specialists - Established 1985 - www.ctafire.co.uk
Natural Born Cynic

Offline Chariot

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2011, 02:06:43 PM »
From 1 October 2010, the Equality Act replaced most of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA). However, the Disability Equality Duty in the DDA continues to apply.

Some hearing impaired persons may not be able to hear an audible alarm, therefore, a sounder outside the toilet may not be a suitable means of raising the alarm for this relevant person. There is some guidance on this issue on page 23 of the Fire risk assessment supplementary guide Means of escape for disabled persons.

Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2477
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2011, 04:36:36 PM »
What irritates me is the 'experts' saying that every disabled toilet needs a beacon, but normal ones don't.

Most hearing impaired people are perfectly capable of using (& do) the normal toilets, which in a lot of buildings don't have loads of people in them all the time so they are just as likely to be alone in them during an alarm as if they were in the disabled one.

Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36

Offline Tom Sutton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2287
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2011, 07:23:12 PM »

Do we take this to mean sounders/beacons should be installed in every WC even if alarm levels are adequate from sounders installed outside the WC?

I agree David, providing the General Fire Notices are clear, the person with normal hearing can respond to sounder or beacons he doesn't need both.
All my responses only apply to England and Wales and they are an overview of the subject, hopefully it will point you in the right direction and always treat with caution.

Offline wee brian

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2424
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2011, 10:23:19 PM »
there's some clearer guidance in ADB

Offline jokar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1472
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #5 on: July 27, 2011, 06:21:24 PM »
come on people, surley the term is an accessible toilet, a disabled one is one not working!

Offline Wiz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1591
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2011, 09:43:09 AM »
come on people, surley the term is an accessible toilet, a disabled one is one not working!

Accessible toilet? Surely all toilet facilities should be accessible otherwise there is no point in providing such facility.

If we are being pedantic, shouldn't we call them 'toliets with failicities possibly helpful for some persons with disablements'

Graeme

  • Guest
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2011, 10:36:50 PM »
DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1995 (DDA)
1. Introduction
This Guidance note aims to highlight some of the possible effects of the Disability Discrimination Act
will have on fire alarm and detection systems.
Although much is written regarding the DDA and its related documents, there is little in the way of
prescriptive detail and much is based on what is considered “reasonable”, thus many solutions may be
acceptable for any particular situation.
2. Background
The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) was introduced in 1995, under which service providers have a
range of duties, which may affect the way in which services are provided for disabled people. These
duties are being introduced in three stages:
• Since 2nd December 1996 it has been unlawful for disabled people to be treated less favourably
for reasons related to their disability.
• Since 1st October 1999 service providers have had to make “reasonable adjustments” to
accommodate disabled people, by providing extra help or making changes in the way services
are provided.
• Since 1st October 2004, service providers have had to make “reasonable adjustments” to
premises to overcome barriers to access.
The Disability Rights Commission (DRC) is an independent body which was established in April 2000
by Act of Parliament to stop discrimination and promote equality of opportunity for disabled people. The
DRC helps disabled people to get their rights under the DDA and supports legal cases to test the limits
of the law.
3. Who is a service provider?
Service providers are companies or organisations that offer goods, services or facilities to the public in
the UK. The following categories are included:
• Financial services – banks, building societies and insurance companies
• Health services including hospitals and Doctors surgeries
• Courts, solicitors and advice centres
• Cinemas and theatres
• Transport facilities (but not the vehicles)
• Shops, hotels and restaurants
• Sports centres, sports grounds and parks
• Private education
• Schools, colleges and universities when used for non-educational activities.

4. Employers
Employers are covered by the Discrimination (employment) Regulations 1996 if they employ more than
15 people, whether part time or full time, however from 1st October 2004 the regulations were extended
to cover all employers. The aim is to ensure equality of employment opportunities including features of
a building or its fittings, which might prove a disadvantage to disabled employees.
Prison officers, Police, Firefighters, and the armed forces are not covered by the act, neither are
employees who work on ships or aircraft or who work largely outside Great Britain. However, the DRC
provides guidance on their website on how the uniformed services can deal with the issues raised by
the Act.
5. Who is a disabled person?
Under the act a "disabled person" is legally defined as someone with "a physical or mental impairment
that has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his/her ability to carry out normal day-to-day
activities".
Normal-day-to-day activities include:
• mobility – e.g. being able to walk to the local shop
• manual dexterity – e.g. typing
• physical co-ordination
• continence
• ability to lift, carry or otherwise move everyday objects
• speaking, hearing or seeing
• memory or ability to concentrate, learn or understand
• perception of the risk of physical danger
The law also covers people with severe disfigurements, and ‘hidden’ disabilities like dyslexia and
epilepsy, depending upon the severity of the impairment. It can also cover people with progressive
conditions, such as HIV, cancer or multiple sclerosis. People who have had a disability in the past are
also covered, even if they have recovered – for example those who have had episodes of mental ill
health. People who have severe back pain or arthritis can be covered by the law if that condition means
that their ability to do normal activities is impaired.
Some conditions are not considered to be disabilities for the purposes of the Act. These are:
• addiction to or dependency on alcohol, nicotine, or any other substance (unless the substance
has been medically prescribed)
• the condition known as seasonal allergic rhinitis (e.g. hayfever), except where it aggravates the
effect of another condition
• tendency to set fires
• tendency to steal
• tendency to physical or sexual abuse of other persons
• exhibitionism
• voyeurism

6. What is discrimination?
Since October 1st 2004, the Disability Discrimination Act outlawed the following kinds of discrimination
by all employers:
a) direct discrimination
b) failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments
c) treating a disabled person less favourably
d) subjecting a disabled person to harassment
e) victimisation of a disabled person
As far as Fire alarm systems are concerned Discrimination via options b) and c) apply: treating the
disabled person less favourably than other customers because of their disability or not making
reasonable adjustments to the way the service is delivered. Less favourable treatment can occur in
three different ways: refusing to serve the person, providing a lower standard of service, or providing
the service on worse terms. (It is not necessary to show that others were actually treated better just
that they would have been treated better.)
7. Making Changes
Whereas the previous stages of the act have concentrated on changing practices, policies or
procedures and providing auxiliary aids to help the disabled, this final stage now calls for physical
changes to be made to properties if a feature makes it unreasonably difficult for disabled people to use
services.
Nothing in the Act requires manufacturers or designers to make changes to their products, packaging
or instructions, as they are not in themselves providing a service. It does however suggest that the
consideration of disabled customers would be a matter of good practice.
8. Documents
Although this Fact File is concerned with the DDA there are other related documents that have a
bearing on the way fire detection and alarm systems are affected by the act. A more comprehensive
list of information is given at the end of this document.
These are:
• Approved Document M of the building regulations for England and Wales
• Building Standards (Scotland) Regulations (was Part T until 2000 when it was incorporated into
the general technical standards)
(Note: Approved Documents are intended to provide guidance for some of the more common
building situations. However, there may well be alternative ways of achieving compliance with the
requirements. Thus there is no obligation to adopt any particular solution contained in an Approved
Document if you prefer to meet the relevant requirement in some other way.)
BS 5839-1 2002. Fire detection and Alarm systems for buildings – Part 1: Code of practice for design,
installation, commissioning and maintenance.
BS 8300:2001 design of buildings and their approaches to meet the needs of disabled people. Code of
practice.

9. How may Fire detection and alarm systems be affected?
FD&A systems are likely to be affected where they interface with the public, that is:
• The provision and sighting of manual call points
• The methods by which an alarm is annunciated
• Features that may be controlled by the fire system along escape routes such as automatic door
closers or route signage.
9.1. Manual call points are not specifically mentioned in the act, but guidance is given in section
20 of BS 5839-1 where a significant proportion of the occupants have limited mobility. In
particular clauses 20.2(e) and 20.2(h) refer to area where a reduction in travel distance and a
small reduction in mounting height to help the disabled, where mobility may be reduced.
In the majority of public areas there is unlikely to be a need to deviate from the normal
distribution of call points as there will be able bodied people who can operate a call point and
assist those less mobile. However the requirements of 20.2(h) to mount the call point in well
illuminated positions on a contrasting background should be headed to assist the partially
sighted.
Similar consideration may be required for green call points used to release electrically locked
doors.
9.2. Alarm Annunciation
Alarm sounders are specifically mentioned in the DDA and examples are given where audible
alarms should be supplemented by visuals. This is reinforced by Approved Document M that
states:
4.24 Sleeping accommodation will satisfy Requirement M1 if:
9.2.2.1.1. e) all bedrooms have a visual fire alarm signal, in addition to the
requirements of Part B
5.4 Sanitary Accommodation will satisfy Requirement M1 or M3 if:
9.2.2.1.2. g). any fire alarm emits a visual and audible signal to warn occupants with
hearing or visual impairments;
(Note: M1 = Access and Use, M2 = Access to Extensions to buildings other than Dwellings, M3
= Sanitary Conveniences in Extensions to Buildings other than dwellings.)
BS 8300 Design of buildings and their approaches to meet the needs of disabled people. Code
of practice, was used as the base standard for many of the requirements in Approved Document
M and states:
“Consideration should be given to the installation of alarm/alerting systems for people with
impaired hearing, such as flashing visual devices and vibrating devices, for use in conjunction
with proprietary or conventional systems.
Note 1: These devices can take the form of wearable paging units, pillow vibrating units or
under mattress pads designed to wake a person from sleep.
Note 2: Certain frequencies in flashing/stroboscopic light systems can cause confusion,
disorientation, and in some people epileptic fits.”

The standard goes on to specifically recommend that the fire alarm systems should be both
visual and audible in kitchens, sanitary facilities and bedrooms.
BS5839-1 section 18 specifically deals with “Fire alarm warnings alarms for people with
impaired hearing”, while section 17 covers the use of “Visual alarm signals”.
Although visual alarm devices are mentioned they are not the only alarm devices that may be
employed. BS 5839-1 18.2.1 allows for tactile alarms whether fixed moveable or portable.
Portable devices are those that may be carried on the person and can use radio, induction loop
or infrared technology. They should however be considered as a supplement to the primary
means of giving an alarm.
Where visual alarm devices are installed in sleeping accommodation they should not be
considered the primary method of waking sleeping persons the other devices described above
should be used.
9.3. Fire Doors, not mentioned in the DDA, but are covered in Approved document M
3.10 Internal doors will satisfy requirement M1 or M2 if:
k) fire doors, particularly those in corridors, are held open with an electro-magnetic device, but
self-close: when:
– activated by smoke detectors linked to the door individually, or to a main fire/smoke
alarm system;
– the power supply fails;
– activated by a hand-operated switch;
These requirements should be normal fire alarm practice for units which use magnetically operated
door retainers, but may require the provision of a push-to-release switch if one is not incorporated in
the retainer itself.
10. Frequently asked Questions
10.1. What devices can be installed to meet the requirements of the DDA?
The DDA itself requires that reasonable adjustments are made to accommodate disable persons.
How this is achieved will depend on the type of building and its use. Approved document M states
that the requirements can be met by installing additional visual alarms in bedrooms and sanitary
accommodation. BS 8300 recommends the use of additional flashing visual devices and vibrating
devices.
Currently the additional visual devices can either be a separate visual device, or a combined
sounder/visual device which some manufacturers supply.
10.2. Should visual devices be installed throughout the premises?
As mentioned earlier as the DDA itself requires “reasonable adjustments” and BS 8300 and AD M
only specify that additional visual devices be installed in kitchens, toilets and bedrooms, there is no
set requirement to install them throughout a premises. The decision to do so should be taken after
a risk assessment is carried or at the request of the client.
10.3. What spacings should be used when installing the additional visual devices?
In the absence of any UK standards we suggest you seek the advice of the manufacturer.

However as a rule of thumb the following spacing for visual devices can be considered:
• For large public areas one visual device for every 3 detectors/sounder i.e. about 1 every
30m.
• In small sanitary facilities and bedrooms one device should be sufficient.
• For large rooms similar spacings to public areas should be considered.
This follows US experience in particular NFPA 72 which gives detailed guidance on the spacings of
US products. However, the US products tend to have a significantly higher light output than for UK
products. This guidance will be continually reviewed based on the proposed research project see
10.4 below.
10.4. How bright should the additional devices be?
At present there is very little experience or guidance in the UK on the required light output of the
visual devices to alert deaf persons. There has been a great deal of work done on this in the US
and NFPA 72 goes into great detail in deciding what should be specified depending on room size
and geometry but this may not directly translate to UK experience. BS 5446-3 the product standard
for alarm devices for Deaf person in residential premises specifies a light level but the devices
incorporate a vibrating device as well as the flashing visual device. The colour of the light is also
important. We recognise that the light output of the device is related to the power required to drive
the visual device, the brighter the light the greater the power required. If very bright visual devices
are required this will have an effect on the design of fire alarm system in the UK. BFPSA is currently
discussing the light output of visual devices with BSI and ODPM. It is hoped that ODPM will support
a research project to determine the light output of visual devices.
10.5. Visual devices in sleeping accommodation
ODPM have confirmed that it was never the intent of the UK Regulations that visual devices in
bedrooms should be the primary means of waking a sleeping person. It is recommended that the
visual device in bedrooms should be supplemented by an additional means of waking the persons
with reduced hearing abilities, such as a vibrating device.
11. Further information
Documents
a) Disabilities Discrimination Act 1995
b) Discrimination (employment) Regulations 1996
c) Disability Discrimination act 1995 Code of Practice Rights of Access Goods, Facilities,
Services and Premises. Disability Rights Commission 2002
d) Approved Document M Access and facilities for disabled people.
e) Building Standards (Scotland) Regulations
f) BS5839-1 2002. Fire detection and Alarm systems for buildings – Part 1: Code of practice
for design, installation, commissioning and maintenance
g) BS8300: 2001. Design of buildings and their approaches to meet the needs of disabled
people. Code of practice to make reasonable adjustments.
h) BS 5446-3 . Fire detection and fire alarm devices for dwellings. Specification for smoke
alarm kits for deaf and hard of hearing people

Offline Fishy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2011, 01:51:46 PM »
Neither the DDA nor the 2010 Equality Act contain any specific requirements as regards fire.  It's completely within the remit of the relevant fire safety legislation (depending upon where in the land you are...).

Generally speaking, there should be a means of giving warning in case of fire, that is suitable for anyone who may credibly be in the building.  Typically, though, this doesn't necessitate flashing beacons, because even if hearing-impaired people are in the building, they are likely to be alerted either by the actions of others (the hearing-impaired are often very observant of this) or more reliably by the fire marshals during a building 'sweep'.  Essentially, if the 'PEEP', or, in a public building, the emergency plan, tells a credible story about how they will be alerted, then you need do no more.

It's normally only where it is possible that hearing-impaired people will be lone-working or will be in an area that won't be 'swept' that other means should be considered.

...and yes, I too am mystified by the obsession for equipping toilets designed for people with mobility impairments with flashing beacons!
« Last Edit: August 26, 2011, 04:04:03 PM by Fishy »

Offline DavyFire

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2011, 11:46:22 PM »
Just been involved in a city centre four storey office building which is being converted to a beauty therapy use. i am acting on behalf of the landlord. The tenant started off doing changes which became major alterations. Building Control became involved. BC now want visual indicators (of fire alarm ) in all hallways and rooms where clients will be.
Totally unreasonable I feel as clients will always be under supervision of staff. If staff are employed who have visual or sight defects etc, then the FRA should pick this up and suitable arrangements will be made.
The tenant has invested a lot in these difficult times, now to be told to incur this totally unnecessary expense due to Building Control.
The sparks starting fitting the beacons today!! AGH!!

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: Flashing beacons and DDA
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2011, 11:51:53 AM »
Just been involved in a city centre four storey office building which is being converted to a beauty therapy use. i am acting on behalf of the landlord. The tenant started off doing changes which became major alterations. Building Control became involved. BC now want visual indicators (of fire alarm ) in all hallways and rooms where clients will be.
Totally unreasonable I feel as clients will always be under supervision of staff. If staff are employed who have visual or sight defects etc, then the FRA should pick this up and suitable arrangements will be made.
The tenant has invested a lot in these difficult times, now to be told to incur this totally unnecessary expense due to Building Control.
The sparks starting fitting the beacons today!! AGH!!
Under FOI I would want to know if the BC offices in Belfast are fitted with visual warnings? And if not why.
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.