It's not uncommon to find oddities like this - in our main area of work (multi-occupancies) it occurs like this:
Office block from 1950's/60's has a brand spanking new (at the time) 240V AC Gent's manual fire alarm system, which if they are being very advanced includes a mechanical drop flag indicator panel.
Building is certified under OSRP & then FPA with system being OK. No material changes occur to the buliding overall so the fire alarm is still accepted.
In the late 80's & 90's proactive tenants move in and want (or are required by BCO on fit out) automatic detection (& their consultant advises the need for a battery back up).
The mains system won't accomodate this (those nasty high voltage ionisation detectors are long gone), but the landlord won't change it as (a) it works & (b) the fire officer says it's OK
Tenant then installs their own modern 24V conventional (or addressable) category M/P2 or category L1 system to their part of the building, has a mains interface fitted & then promptly forgets about ongoing maintenance.
Over time this is repeated throughout the building until you end up wit hone master 240V system and 12 seperate 24V systems with relays to different segmets of the building.
The set up sends engineers & risk assessord off in gibering fits and ther eare massive arguements over who is responsible for weekly tsting what & servicing all of it.
A minor variation is where the common areas require detection, but instead of a new system, the landlord bungs all the detectors on a 1, 2 or 4 zone conventional panel which is then spliced into the 240v system.
This creates all sorts of headaches & we do our upmost to persuade landlords to rip the 240v out and put a new conv or addressable system in and also to persuade tenants wanting detection to their floors to simply add in to the master system rather than go down the route of putting their own panel in.
You get some strange set ups as a result of mix n match, such as duplicate call points (toss a coin to decide which one to smash) and mixed sounder types (is the bell a fire or the klaxxon???)
The fact that some enforcement officers haven't read the whole Health and Safety(signs and signals) regulations and seem to think it's only about the running man doesn't help either.
Fortunately we have had reasonable success in getting 240V systems out over the years, but many still persist. The similar vintage 24V systems are a different prospect as they can accomodate AFD & meet the back up power requirements despite not being BS5839 compliant (some have little more than a battery box & reset button, no zoning & indication) - they need upgrade at some point, but are a lower priorit ythan a 240v system.
Even the now 'illegal' 240V system beats rotary gongs hands down, which are still in use in some buildings (2 storey multi-occ office building 75m x 15m with the only fire warning a rotary gong on the outside on the main entrance)