FireNet Community
FIRE SERVICE AND GENERAL FIRE SAFETY TOPICS => Technical Advice => Topic started by: Benzerari on September 28, 2008, 11:49:41 PM
-
Guys;
According to the following statistics, why Dwellings are still less considered or not as much as buildings of mutiple occupancies, I mean in terms of standard and legislations, even the statistics not only the one displayed in here are still showing serious figures of fire incidents...etc?
(http://i472.photobucket.com/albums/rr87/BenzFerari/statistic3.jpg)
-
The thing is that you need to be careful in taking the "facts" quoted in statistics as actual fact without taking into account the full picture.
While the number of dwelling fires numbered 24 there were 7 incidents in education (and by that I assume they mean schools) but you must bear in mind that pro rata/percentage wise there were more incidents in education than dwellings (simple maths - fire to dwelling ratio versus fire to educational establishment ratio).
-
These statistics arn't really giving much useful information without a link between the types of premises and causes of the fires in each.
-
The thing is that you need to be careful in taking the "facts" quoted in statistics as actual fact without taking into account the full picture.
While the number of dwelling fires numbered 24 there were 7 incidents in education (and by that I assume they mean schools)
but you must bear in mind that pro rata/percentage wise there were more incidents in education than dwellings (simple maths - fire to dwelling ratio versus fire to educational establishment ratio).
Where did you see these figures, at least display a link.
-
These statistics arn't really giving much useful information without a link between the types of premises and causes of the fires in each.
There are much information regarding the death in dwellings by toxic gases and not from burning...etc
The point in this published statistic is that it's among the latest ones and it's real, if you want to order the full report you might find out more serious things...etc
Dwellings in the above figures are classified the first in terms of number of fires and that's the point, but in terms of substantial loss, it's obvious that manufacturing loss is the highest. Since dwellings are where people normally spend '8h' sleeping or say the 1/3 of '24h' time spent in, while in other infrastructures people are normally awake. Which then makes people in dwellings more exposed to risks rather than in other sort of buildings...etc
-
These statistics arn't really giving much useful information without a link between the types of premises and causes of the fires in each.
There are much information regarding the death in dwellings by toxic gases and not from burning...etc
The point in this published statistic is that it's among the latest ones and it's real, if you want to order the full report you might find out more serious things...etc
Dwellings in the above figures are classified the first in terms of number of fires and that's the point, but in terms of substantial loss, it's obvious that manufacturing loss is the highest. Since dwellings are where people normally spend '8h' sleeping or say the 1/3 of '24h' time spent in, while in other infrastructures people are normally awake. Which then makes people in dwellings more exposed to risks rather than in other sort of buildings...etc
You're still missing the point in relation to statistics.For sake of arguement lets take the following hypothetical figures and work with them -
Dwelling incidents (in a specific area) - 20
Number of dwellings (in a specific area) - 1000
Incident per dwelling - 1 in 50 (or 2%)
Factory incident (in same area) - 2
Number of Factories - 20
Incident per factory - 1 in 10 (or 10%)
So you can see that the chance/risk is higher in the factory scenario is 5 times higher than the dwelling scenario.
-
These statistics arn't really giving much useful information without a link between the types of premises and causes of the fires in each.
There are much information regarding the death in dwellings by toxic gases and not from burning...etc
The point in this published statistic is that it's among the latest ones and it's real, if you want to order the full report you might find out more serious things...etc
Dwellings in the above figures are classified the first in terms of number of fires and that's the point, but in terms of substantial loss, it's obvious that manufacturing loss is the highest. Since dwellings are where people normally spend '8h' sleeping or say the 1/3 of '24h' time spent in, while in other infrastructures people are normally awake. Which then makes people in dwellings more exposed to risks rather than in other sort of buildings...etc
You're still missing the point in relation to statistics.For sake of arguement lets take the following hypothetical figures and work with them -
Dwelling incidents (in a specific area) - 20
Number of dwellings (in a specific area) - 1000
Incident per dwelling - 1 in 50 (or 2%)
Factory incident (in same area) - 2
Number of Factories - 20
Incident per factory - 1 in 10 (or 10%)
So you can see that the chance/risk is higher in the factory scenario is 5 times higher than the dwelling scenario.
Buzz;
You are comparing the number of dwellings and factories in a given area, I agree there are more dwellings than factories, and this is obvious but not the main point, the main point is the results in regards to the number of people dying in both manufacturing and dwelling apart from other substantial loss?
[ 95% of deaths in fire victims were caused during smouldering phase of fire, and while the victims where sleeping 4/5 have been toxically killed ].
However, the main concern as per the first post, why dwellings are still less considered or not as much as buildings of multiple occupancies, I mean in terms of standard and legislations
-
Its because there are more residential premises than any other type in the UK. And when you consider this the number of instances pro rata are very small.
In addition how would you police it?
I disagree that dwellings are not considered as much as opther types. ADB, building controls and BS 5588 pt 1 are very good and extremely prescriptive. In addition residential buildings are targetted by local fire services to improve safety amongst the masses.
-
New build dwellings have smokies installed do they not??
-
Guys; why Dwellings are still less considered or not as much as buildings of multiple occupancies, I mean in terms of standard and legislations,
If you are asking why most safety legislation does not include single domestic dwellings it has always been accepted that the proverb "Englishmans home is his Castle" has some validity and is sacrosanct which includes the legislators.
Also the head of a private single dwelling has a highly vested interest in all the occupants because they are family and s/he will always provide a safe environment for them.
Where there is a profit motive then regulation is considered acceptable.
-
Guys; why Dwellings are still less considered or not as much as buildings of multiple occupancies, I mean in terms of standard and legislations,
If you are asking why most safety legislation does not include single domestic dwellings it has always been accepted that the proverb "Englishmans home is his Castle" has some validity and is sacrosanct which includes the legislators.
Also the head of a private single dwelling has a highly vested interest in all the occupants because they are family and s/he will always provide a safe environment for them.
Where there is a profit motive then regulation is considered acceptable.
Succinctly put but to put it in basic terms - you and your family are your concern and if they perish in a fire because you have no smoke detetcion then what a bad person you are.However,in the case of HMO's you have to give adequate notice so that everyone else can get out while you succumb to smoke inhaliation after setting fire to your room (similar applies to hotels).
-
I think, It’s not just a matter of just agreeing or disagreeing about…, any way that's what I have found in terms of legislation just to state some:
1. Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act 1963
2. Private Places of Entertainment Act 1967
3. Factories Act 1971
4. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974
5. Fire Certificates (Special Premises) regulations 1976
6. Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations 1997
Etc…
Thus, what about dwellings? Why is not an obligation by the law to have means of fire protection for dwellings, even they are private?
Also, in terms of standard, why the levels of protections L1 to L5 in addition to M and P...etc, are not applicable to dwellings accordingly... including houses with their different sizes even if they are privates?
Dwellings are covered separately with less tedious requirements in BS5839 part: 6. through what they called the grades from A to F…, dwellings too are multiple occupancies when it comes to the number of people living in, or coming in and out or invited some times so what’s the difference?
In the common sense, it’s the people’s lives that matter first isn’t it? What ever the sort of buildings?
-
I think, It’s not just a matter of just agreeing or disagreeing about…, any way that's what I have found in terms of legislation just to state some:
1. Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act 1963
2. Private Places of Entertainment Act 1967
3. Factories Act 1971
4. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974
5. Fire Certificates (Special Premises) regulations 1976
6. Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations 1997
Etc…
Thus, what about dwellings? Why is not an obligation by the law to have means of fire protection for dwellings, even they are private?
Also, in terms of standard, why the levels of protections L1 to L5 in addition to M and P...etc, are not applicable to dwellings accordingly... including houses with their different sizes even if they are privates?
Dwellings are covered separately with less tedious requirements in BS5839 part: 6. through what they called the grades from A to F…, dwellings too are multiple occupancies when it comes to the number of people living in, or coming in and out or invited some times so what’s the difference?
In the common sense, it’s the people’s lives that matter first isn’t it? What ever the sort of buildings?
I think that it is fair to say that you have a very set opinion on this Benz.I for one would not welcome some council/fire authority type person putting his nose in where it is not wanted.
It is common sense to have smoke detectors fitted correctly in everyones home but those who don't are no different to those in the commercial sector who cut corners where fire alarm and detection systems are required.
One point however - if you have a 3 or more storey house in excess of 200m3 then you should have a part 1 system installed covering escape routes,areas of circulation and rooms of risk of fire to occupants.
-
Interestingly, in parts of the US Fire Codes do apply to domestic houses - when I last stayed there with friends whose parents had emigrated their house had smoke alarms & extinguishers in set locations as prescribed by code - Fire Marshals & Buildings Control could check this and issue citations if it was missing or defective
-
Mr Blair it seems, is back in the guise of Benz.
-
Mr Blair it seems, is back in the guise of Benz.
Possibly in a political sort of forums, not the one you see in here, it will never ever happen mate; it’s too late for him to change of career, even in disguise :D
What doesn't work in the real world, it wouldn't work even in disguise
-
Interestingly, in parts of the US Fire Codes do apply to domestic houses - when I last stayed there with friends whose parents had emigrated their house had smoke alarms & extinguishers in set locations as prescribed by code - Fire Marshals & Buildings Control could check this and issue citations if it was missing or defective
It seems Americanization is in the way to affect even BS. But, I don’t mean to saying it’s part of the Globalization by trying to opinionate… to Pro-American in every single bit :D
-
Here is further findings:
see this: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/fire/pdf/144260.pdf look for dwellings. also download the 2006 version.
or see this: http://www2.theiet.org/Publish/WireRegs/WiringMatters/Documents/Issue17/2005_17_winter_wiring_matters__complete_adverts.pdf look for page 1
-
Even being mercenary and in the light of a BIG business potential - I say no to this.Keep the responsibilty of the safety of your family to the one.
Otherwise,we may as well all move into high dependancy nursing homes and let someone wipe our butts because we don't want to take on even that responsibility.
-
New build dwellings have smokies installed do they not??
hopefully to L1 level of protection, or sort of... ( by means smoke alarms every where...)
-
Also, that's what I found in terms of standard:
[ The Approved Document B (of building regulation 2000) states in paragraph 1.3, that if houses are not protected by an automatic fire detection and alarm system in accordance with relevant recommendation of BS5839: Part: 1, or BS5839: Part: 6 to at least a grade E type LD3 standard, they should be provided with a suitable number of smoke alarm installed in accordance with the guidance of paragraphs 1.4 to 1.22 (page: 15 and 16) of the Approved Document...etc ]
That's what shows less tedious requirement for dwellings, in comparison to other buildings of multiple occupancies...etc
-
New build dwellings have smokies installed do they not??
hopefully to L1 level of protection, or sort of... ( by means smoke alarms every where...)
Ahh,but you are mixing up part 1 requirements and grades with those in part 6.
-
don't go there please.....
-
don't go there please.....
..lights blue touch paper and retires to a safe distance!
-
New build dwellings have smokies installed do they not??
hopefully to L1 level of protection, or sort of... ( by means smoke alarms every where...)
Ahh,but you are mixing up part 1 requirements and grades with those in part 6.
I want it to be mixed up, I hope if one day the same analogy of BS5839 P1, to be applied to dwellings BS5839 P6, and that's the purpose of this add. :)
-
Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse
-
Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse
I do understand you don't want to spend more in your home Buzz, but consider the common sense :)