FireNet Community
FIRE SERVICE AND GENERAL FIRE SAFETY TOPICS => Community Fire Safety => Topic started by: ps on February 05, 2009, 04:10:35 PM
-
Hello all - hopefully an easy one for you guys...where a builder has decided to install a fire alarm system in a residential purpose built block, with no staff present at that block how often would you need to check the alarm via the call points?
Someone has suggested getting cleaning contractors to do it, but I'm not keen at all...
Is quaterly enough given that the alarm is for common areas only and all properties are built to a good standard with 1 hour protection...come to think of it - why on earth is there an alarm there in the first place?
ANy help welcomed!
-
If its there it needs to be tested and maintained so that if people do try to operate it it will respond as expected.
As you say it may not be needed- builders do some funny things sometimes- if risk assessment says its not needed you have two options- either maintain it and test it in accordance with BS5839 part 1 or take it out.
I have come across flats where the builder has installed a full system in common areas and linked it to the detectors in flats- this really is a nightmare all round and taking out is not then an option unless you install replacement mains powered detectors in all flats.
Also the system may be configured to operate the ventilation system so act with caution.
If its less than a year old you may also have to have a chat with the building control before making any changes.
Is there a tenant who may be willing to take on the weekly testing and daily check of the panel for faults?
-
are builders diversifying with the credit crunch and installing fire alarms? god help us all.
-
Sorry guys, lack of accurate terminiology on my part - the builders didnt install it, it was indeed done by a proper installer - but having done the assessment myself - I can't find a justification for it?
Given that, if someone has Eastenders on nice and loud in their abode, no ones going to hear it in the flats. If they do hear it and there is (by some miracle) a problem in the lobby or stairs, then aren't we potentially sending them out into a smoky (or jolly hot!) corridor when they'd be better off inside continuing to watch Eastenders blissfully unaware.
I thought nice new buildings built in accordance with building regs didnt need them in these circs? There is no particular fire hazard in the corridors, a small amount of post on a table sometimes, and entry is secure.
Any thoughts before I make an ass of myself and get it decommissioned? I'm assuming someone put it there for a reason - just can't figure out what that reason should be?
-
sending them out into a smoky (or jolly hot!) corridor when they'd be better off inside continuing to watch Eastenders blissfully unaware.
Any thoughts before I make an ass of myself and get it decommissioned? I'm assuming someone put it there for a reason - just can't figure out what that reason should be?
Think I'd prefer to take my chances with the jolly hot corridor ps than watch Eastenders.
There is a reason why it was put there. The installer charged more to do it that way.
-
AH - but what if its a nice re run of that well know series London's Burning? What then huh!
I though I was being too cynical - you mean people really put these things in if there's no need???
If we go done the easy route and keep the status quo (I can already hear the arguements from some residents if we suggest removal) is the weekly test an absolute requirement or a moveable feast?
-
ignore poor spelling on previous - typing too fast....
-
PS I still think that if its there people may rely on it so it should be maintained and tested. Whether its needed or not.
Either maintain and test it or remove it. Thats the choice as I see it.
When I asked a national building firm why they kept putting these systems in they told me that the NHBC building control require it wherever there is a cupboard for electricity meters in a single stair building. Now as the ADB allows electricity meters in a single staircase I cannot see why enclosing them in a small cupboard should then warrant it but there you go
-
I think that in many cases there is overprovision because some don't know when it is not necessary. When in doubt put in the lot.
Sorry, could not find a rhyming word for "doubt" which fits.
-
"when in doubt, maintain it with clout and you'll never, ever be without!"
See, all it takes is a glass of red and it flows well.
Ok so the maintenance thing - that has to be weekly?
-
testing does. maintenance per BS min twice a year
-
is the weekly test best practice then? Or a BS thing? Sorry to labour the point but I don't want to suggest going against a BS but I might suggest they stretch testing to once every 2 weeks or even 4? Unless someone tells me they think thats a dreadful idea and I should burn in hell etc etc...
-
is the weekly test best practice then? Or a BS thing? Sorry to labour the point but I don't want to suggest going against a BS but I might suggest they stretch testing to once every 2 weeks or even 4? Unless someone tells me they think thats a dreadful idea and I should burn in hell etc etc...
You don't have to test it weekly ps. It is only a recommendation of the BS. The only legal requirement is that it is maintained. However, in the event of an audit of the FRA by the F&RS it will advise you if your policy of fortnightly tests is sufficient or not, in its view.
-
brilliant - thanks for clairty Nearlythere. Would you know from expereince if I am wide of the mark here? If every one else just bites the bullet and employs someone to go around testing these things weekly at unmanned properties, then I'm happy to keep status quo - however I just can't see it myself!
-
Where they are installed then usually I find that managing agents will visit monthly and test alarm and emergency lighting. However often they find an interested tenant who is prepared to do it weekly.
Most important though is that where these BS5939 systems are installed there should be a person - a responsible person according to the BS - who will check the panel daily for faults and report them to the engineers or agent, follow up on faults previously reported and who has the necessary skills to silence and reset it in the event of it gong off!
-
good idea - now all we need to do is find an interested resident or two!
Many thanks again guys - as always you've been a great help.
-
Good luck with that
Sorry to be sceptical but ive heard many a fire officer and supposed risk assessor suggest that a resident check the system daily and do fire alar tests weekly
Let me introduce you to the real world PS.
Yeah you might convince a resident to check your fire alarm system daily and test it weekly - and bully for you if they do that.
Most residents however will say they want a fee for doing it. And what if that resident goes on holiday ? Who tests it then?
Look at the British standard . As per usual it is written by people who have no idea of what goes on on planet earth. But hey they get paid well so whats the problem?
Read the BS. It does not state a call point should be tested weekly and anyone who suggests it does had best question their competency. And actually had better find another job because they obviously haven't the first clue what they are doing.
Better still ask a Magistrate or a Judge what they think.
-
Good luck with that
Sorry to be sceptical but ive heard many a fire officer and supposed risk assessor suggest that a resident check the system daily and do fire alar tests weekly
Let me introduce you to the real world PS.
Yeah you might convince a resident to check your fire alarm system daily and test it weekly - and bully for you if they do that.
Most residents however will say they want a fee for doing it. And what if that resident goes on holiday ? Who tests it then?
Look at the British standard . As per usual it is written by people who have no idea of what goes on on planet earth. But hey they get paid well so whats the problem?
Read the BS. It does not state a call point should be tested weekly and anyone who suggests it does had best question their competency. And actually had better find another job because they obviously haven't the first clue what they are doing.
Better still ask a Magistrate or a Judge what they think.
Don't think anyone has said that call point should be tested weekly CF3.
44.2 Recommendations for weekly testing by the user
When testing the fire detection system, there may be a need to isolate ancillary outputs.
The following recommendations apply:
a) Every week, a manual call point should be operated during normal working hours. It should be
confirmed that the control equipment is capable of processing a fire alarm signal and providing an output
to fire alarm sounders, and to ensure that the fire alarm signal is correctly received at any alarm
receiving centre to which fire alarm signals are transmitted. It is not necessary to confirm that all fire
alarm sounder circuits operate correctly at the time of this test.
NOTE 1 It is essential that any alarm receiving centre is contacted immediately before, and immediately after, the weekly test
Agree though that daily and weekly user checks are very much OTT.
-
I have to say Cleveland I think you are being incredibly sceptical, and some of your comments are both unfair and untrue.
I deal with many Operators and landlords of HMOs and sheltered schemes who rely on trusted tenants or residents to keep any eye on the fire alarm system, report any faults, undertake weekly tests, reset the panel etc
So long as they are given appropriate training I don't see any issue with that. Look again Cleveland the BS infact does recommend that testing is undertaken weekly, remember it is only a recommendation and in certain types of premises that isn't always possible.
-
Hiya Cleveland
As always its horses for courses when it comes to testing fire alarms. Many of the flats built for owner occupiers during the housing boom were fitted- unneccessarily- with fire alarms serving the common areas. I contend that needed or not , if its there it should be tested and maintained - or removed.
In many cases the common areas and the freehold are owned by a management company, the flat owners all being shareholders of th emanagement company, the whole set up being controlled by covenants on the flats themselves. In these cases the "responsible tenant" concept can work very well, often but not always supplemented by a managing agent who undertakes the more onerous maintenance and tests.
On the other hand I would not recommend it in social housing or fully tenanted settings- but then there is more likely to be a managing agent visiting regularly.
I am interested in your comment that the BS does not recommend weekly test of the system using a fire alarm call point? I would be interested in your reasons for suggesting this. Meanwhile I will hone up my decorating skills. ;)
-
The testing aspect can be overcome without site occupiers wanting to help as contractors can do the testing, Metro being the name most associated with the weekly/monthly test market.
The main drawback to this is cost of course