Author Topic: Best way to disguise smoke detectors?  (Read 15887 times)

Offline muggins

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Best way to disguise smoke detectors?
« Reply #15 on: February 04, 2008, 01:18:07 PM »
thanks darren - please email to emma@dcswx.ie

Offline Clive

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Best way to disguise smoke detectors?
« Reply #16 on: February 06, 2008, 08:41:41 AM »
From BS 5839-1:2002  
Section 6   45.4 Recommendations for inspection and test of the system over a 12 month period  
In addition to the work recommended in 45.3, it is recommended that the following work be carried out  every year.   NOTE 1 The work described may be carried out over the course of two or more service visits during each twelve month period.  
a) The switch mechanism of every manual call point should be tested, either by removal of a frangible   element, insertion of a test key or operation of the device as it would be operated in the event of fire.  
b) All automatic fire detectors should be examined, as far as practicable, to ensure that they have not   been damaged, painted, or otherwise adversely affected.

Thereafter, every detector should be functionally tested. The tests used need prove only that the detectors are connected to the system, are operational and are capable of responding to the phenomena they are designed to detect.  
c) Every heat detector should be functionally tested by means of a suitable heat source, unless operation  of the detector in this manner would then necessitate replacement of part or all of the sensing element   (e.g. as in fusible link point detectors or non-integrating line detectors). Special test arrangements will   be required for fusible link heat detectors. The heat source should not have the potential to ignite a fire;   live flame should not be used, and special equipment might be necessary in explosive atmospheres.  
d) Point smoke detectors should be functionally tested by a method that confirms that smoke can enter   the detector chamber and produce a fire alarm signal (e.g. by use of apparatus that generates simulated   smoke or suitable aerosols around the detector). It should be ensured that the material used does not   cause damage to, or affect the subsequent performance of, the detector; the manufacturers guidance on   suitable materials should be followed.  
e) Optical beam smoke detectors should be functionally tested by introducing signal attenuation between   the transmitter and receiver, either by use of an optical filter, smoke or simulated smoke.  
f) Aspirating fire detection systems should be functionally tested as described in 45.4d), with each   sampling point, or group of sampling points, in the pipework of the system treated as a point detector.   Note that not all test products may be appropriate for the purpose.  
g) Carbon monoxide fire detectors should be functionally tested by a method that confirms that carbon   monoxide can enter the detector chamber and produce a fire alarm signal (e.g. by use of apparatus that   generates carbon monoxide or a gas that has a similar effect on the electro-chemical cell as carbon   monoxide).   WARNING Carbon monoxide is a highly toxic gas, and suitable precautions should be taken in its use.   NOTE 2 It should be ensured that any test gas used does not cause damage to, or affect the subsequent performance of, the   detector; the manufacturers guidance on suitable test gases should be followed.  
h) Flame detectors should be functionally tested by a method that confirms that the detector will respond   to a suitable frequency of radiation and produce a fire alarm signal. The guidance of the manufacturer   on testing of detectors should be followed.  
i) In fire detection systems that enable analogue values to be determined at the control and indicating   equipment, it should be confirmed that each analogue value is within the range specified by the   manufacturer.   j) Multi-sensor detectors should be operated by a method that confirms that products of combustion in   the vicinity of the detector can reach the sensors and that a fire signal can be produced as appropriate.

Offline redbadge

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Best way to disguise smoke detectors?
« Reply #17 on: February 06, 2008, 12:00:29 PM »
Quote from: muggins
Any advice on the best way to mask the appearance of smoke/heat detectors? I'm thinking of two scenarios - historic buildings and sleek contemporary dwellings.  Are there any types that are smaller or less obtrusive than others?
Thanks
An aquantance of mine has his concealed very modestly by a tesco carrier bag, kind of defeats the point of it being there - but you definitely cant see the smoke detector !

Offline muggins

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Best way to disguise smoke detectors?
« Reply #18 on: February 06, 2008, 12:03:38 PM »
mmmm. that sounds really pretty

Offline redbadge

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Best way to disguise smoke detectors?
« Reply #19 on: February 06, 2008, 12:18:00 PM »
it's the yellow insultating tape that holds it in place that really sets it off!

Offline Kevin Shea

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • http://www.xtralis.com
Best way to disguise smoke detectors?
« Reply #20 on: February 08, 2008, 09:05:47 AM »
Hi Muggins,

If you are looking for discreet fire detection for graded historic or modern sleek buildings VESDA produce a very discreet capillary sampling points that can be unobtrusively integrated into the surrounding walls and ceilings with minimal visability from the sampling pipes. We have (yes being called VESDA Kev I do work for VESDA!) even had certain occasions where the small sampling points have even been altered to remain flush with the surrounding surface. Send me an email to my address below and I will be happy to soeak with you about how we can help proivde discrete protection.

Kevin Shea
kshea@xtralis.com
01442 206 429