Author Topic: Hotel extention query  (Read 2961 times)

Offline stewbow

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Hotel extention query
« on: February 04, 2010, 10:52:28 PM »
Hi
An old hotel that has detection and sounders in all the bedrooms is having alterations to 4 of the bedrooms.
The 4 rooms are being extended outwards by about 6 meters ( I know, too big and expensive for me to spend the night there)!
My query is regarding a conversation with one of the builders the other day who mentioned that a building regs guy from the council had told him that we might need to put another detector in each of the bedrooms because of a 9 meters from the door rule?
I thought that the detector in the bedroom was to protect the door and we need 75dB at the bedhead, this we will continue to have, so where does the extra detector rule come from,
I'm sure sombody is typing in the answer right now!!!!

thanks

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: Hotel extention query
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2010, 07:12:37 AM »
Are you not talking about the 7.5M rule?
If the room is being increased in size to the extent that the single detector is more than 7.5M from any point then BC may want an additional detector.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2010, 07:47:57 AM by nearlythere »
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline kurnal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6489
    • http://www.peakland-fire-safety.co.uk
Re: Hotel extention query
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2010, 07:31:34 AM »
Thats life isnt it. Fire alarm systems being designed on the hoof by builders and building control officers. I bet the architects plans say the alarm system is to be designed in accordance with BS5839 part 1 1988 as most of them still do.

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: Hotel extention query
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2010, 07:47:02 AM »
Thats life isnt it. Fire alarm systems being designed on the hoof by builders and building control officers. I bet the architects plans say the alarm system is to be designed in accordance with BS5839 part 1 1988 as most of them still do.

And BS5266 Pt1 to 1988.
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline CivvyFSO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: Hotel extention query
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2010, 09:46:59 AM »
I think someone is getting travel distances confused with the BS5839 alarm spec. Travel distance is not mentioned in BS5839 apart from regarding search distance and travel to a call point.

It is a good job that building control know what they are talking about.  :-\

Offline Davo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1144
Re: Hotel extention query
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2010, 09:17:57 PM »
Nearlythere

Assuming the detectors are Heat (................) isn't 7.5 for smoke? (Less for heat)

davo

 

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: Hotel extention query
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2010, 08:24:19 AM »
Nearlythere

Assuming the detectors are Heat (................) isn't 7.5 for smoke? (Less for heat)

davo

 
You are correct Davo, but heat or smoke? Thats another issue which recently had been causing much debate.
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.