Author Topic: Penhallow risk assessor in court.  (Read 32372 times)

Offline Meerkat

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
Re: Penhallow risk assessor in court.
« Reply #30 on: May 10, 2011, 10:48:55 AM »
Charges were dropped against the consultant because the prosecution apparently offered no evidence.  Looks as though FRA wasn't part of his role for the Hotel Compnay at all and he's just been made a scaepgoat.

http://www.shponline.co.uk/incourt-content/full/charge-dropped-against-hotel-fire-consultant

"Following his not-guilty verdict, Mr Tricker told SHP that while his company provides health and safety, as well as food-safety services, to O&C Holdsworth Ltd, it was not engaged to provide fire risk-assessment services for the company prior to the fire."

If this is indeed the case then why did it take so long to come out?  Hasn't done the guy's reputation any favours these last months has it! 
There's nothing simple about a Meerkat...

Offline wee brian

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2424
Re: Penhallow risk assessor in court.
« Reply #31 on: May 10, 2011, 12:48:15 PM »
Brian, if not L2 then what would it be?

Err ignore that - brain wasn't in gear.

In terms of the - when do you upgrade question. The approach that's in CTs draft guide to blocks of flats might be one we could adopt for all such questions.

Offline stevew

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
    • http://firesureuk.co.ok
Re: Penhallow risk assessor in court.
« Reply #32 on: May 10, 2011, 07:00:42 PM »


Base upon the information available my initial thoughts were that the consultant held a degree of accountability.

I now have a degree of sympathy for the individual.

What I fail to understand is that how difficult is it to investigate and identify ownership of a fire risk assessment.
Sounds to me like an 'own goal' by the authorities.  Not the first and will not be the last.

Steve   

 

Offline Wiz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1591
Re: Penhallow risk assessor in court.
« Reply #33 on: May 11, 2011, 10:00:37 AM »


Base upon the information available my initial thoughts were that the consultant held a degree of accountability.

I now have a degree of sympathy for the individual.

What I fail to understand is that how difficult is it to investigate and identify ownership of a fire risk assessment.
Sounds to me like an 'own goal' by the authorities.  Not the first and will not be the last.

Steve   

 

In some sectors too many 'own goals' leads to relegation. In the Public sector no-one seems to care - it's only tax-payers money they waste and other people's living they damage

Offline colin todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
  • Civilianize enforcement -you know it makes sense.
    • http://www.cstodd.co.uk
Re: Penhallow risk assessor in court.
« Reply #34 on: May 11, 2011, 07:39:34 PM »
Brian, You say the nicest things!  Have you gone all cuddly since my taxes have been contributing to your salary?
Colin Todd, C S Todd & Associates

Offline Phoenix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 677
  • Get a bicycle. You will not live to regret it
    • MetaSolutions (Fire Safety Engineering) Ltd.
Re: Penhallow risk assessor in court.
« Reply #35 on: May 11, 2011, 11:31:39 PM »

Base upon the information available my initial thoughts were that the consultant held a degree of accountability.

I now have a degree of sympathy for the individual.


What Universities offer degrees in accountability and degrees in sympathy?  They sound like useful courses.


Offline colin todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
  • Civilianize enforcement -you know it makes sense.
    • http://www.cstodd.co.uk
Re: Penhallow risk assessor in court.
« Reply #36 on: May 13, 2011, 07:39:20 PM »
The vultures appear to have abandoned what they thought was a dying man.
Colin Todd, C S Todd & Associates