Author Topic: Wet chemical extinguisher provision  (Read 12933 times)

Offline Psuedonym

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Wet chemical extinguisher provision
« Reply #15 on: January 03, 2013, 08:46:39 PM »
DP backed up does work. Its not ideal but in competant hands it works and they supress then cool the fire. Suppression systems are the best though. Manually operated if possible, if you wait for the automatic links to break the fire will have spread, possibly to unprotected areas outside the nozzle spread or on appliances incorrectly protected.
Ask the restaurant staff at BHS Wigan. Breakfast was a bit disturbed yesterday with a faulty 3 basket fryer fire. They pulled the MPS and were cooking by lunch.

By rights if suppression systems were fitted and correctly maintained the risk of fire spread is massively reduced. But its always a cost game.

FM's run the world these days and they want to keep their contracts so keep costs to a minimum. As long as they've got the cert and box ticked all is well.

As for fire blankets, why are they sat next to fryers in commercial kitchens if they are not suitable for use? Training or lack of, incorrect advice from fire company engineers/technicians/whatever they're called this week, incorrect manufacturer marketing, profit before safety etc etc.
Try using one on a 18x25" 600.F fryer spitting burning fat out, yet there they sit, next to the fryers. I've stacks of photo's of blankets sat above fryers, sockets/switches sat above fryers etc yet they (the premises) all get pass certs for fire risk assessments.

To say i'm embarrassed with our industry is putting it mildly. The complete lack of competent training and legistive blackmail to sell more products merely for commission and profit its pure hipocrosy.
Ansul R102 Kitchen Suppression Enthusiast


Created using refurbished electrons to ensure I do my bit to save the planet...Polar bear cubs saved so far:2.75. Reduced due to effects of Carbon Footprint on the carpet. It's a bugger to shift...

Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2479
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Re: Wet chemical extinguisher provision
« Reply #16 on: January 03, 2013, 08:58:58 PM »
The problem is, if the RP won't train the staff in using a Wet Chemical safely they aren't going to do team training for a dual agent attack either......

No doubt the removal of general Class C cover in the latest BS is partly because most places won't provide suitable training.

Why a fire blanket next to a fryer? Same reason you see a 2kilo Powder and a fire blanket in any room with a sink and a kettle....£££££

Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36

Offline Psuedonym

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Wet chemical extinguisher provision
« Reply #17 on: January 03, 2013, 09:20:00 PM »
So true. Going off on another rant here, so standby: Morrissons. 9kg DP sat throughout the stores yet what does BS say? Or common sense? Or even H&S? I emailed CFM's (chubb fire mechanical) operational director ages ago over this but got a shirtly response.
Like you say ££££  >:(
Ansul R102 Kitchen Suppression Enthusiast


Created using refurbished electrons to ensure I do my bit to save the planet...Polar bear cubs saved so far:2.75. Reduced due to effects of Carbon Footprint on the carpet. It's a bugger to shift...