The other side is a comparison of the value of the stock verses the very large fines via both the Fire Authority and the HSE if things go wrong not to mention a period as a guest of HM in one of her holiday homes.
I already have my holiday planned which is why I am keen not to accept HM's offer now or in the future.
Suppression is not a possibility as it would cost 10s of ?millions and beefing up the separation would not be cost effective. IMO its must be managed by procedure, which is that upon an evacuation message - everyone leaves without securing the goods.
We have worked hard to minimise the amount of uWFSs at this building which stood at about 20 to 40 and is now down to perhaps 4 - 6 per annum despite having nearly 3000 heads, VESDA and beam detection. So when the evacuation message is given, there is a high likelihood there IS a risk of fire
The main reason for my original post was to enquire if anyone knew of any prosecution for such a delay being caused by staff securing items before leaving. I know there was one in London many years ago, but am struggling to get any details of his or other cases I could use when developing a business case for change.
Can anyone point me in the right direction??