That's certainly the approach I'm seeing from some FRS although some will accept different measures where the cladding is only in certain areas rather than the whole exterior, such as local detection to rooms opening onto clad areas and retaining stay put unless in alarm or an occupier chooses to evacuate.
Some mortgage companies are now withholding granting the money to buyers unless they have a post inspection statement from a competent person in facades and their structure as to the safety of the exterior. Some that accepted test results in isolation back in the immediate post Grenfell days now won't and want more detail.
There is some justification as with a number of the buildings in this situation I've encountered the facade surveyor & fire engineering team brought in to facilitate the inspections have latent defects in the standard of installation & cavity barriers,etc in addition to issues with the actual material. Some areas met 2013 ADB, but not the current one, others didn't even meet the original 2013 ADB at the time of build!
What I've read in the fire (& general consumer rights) news and seen on actual sites only reinforces my view that I wouldn't live or invest in anything built in the last 20+ years!