Author Topic: Merseyside FRS  (Read 21479 times)

Offline PhilB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 963
Merseyside FRS
« Reply #30 on: May 08, 2007, 08:06:42 AM »
Quote from: wee brian
now you are contradicting yourself again phil
No I'm not Wee Brian, read it again carefully.

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Merseyside FRS
« Reply #31 on: May 08, 2007, 02:55:47 PM »
Just to help cloud the issue more between Certification under Fire Service Orders and H&S W/P Regs. A certificate issued under the Fire Service Order is effectively a means of escape certificate and used to be called just that in the past. The risk to occupants from the undertaking within the building was not an issue other than maybe a reduction in travel distance where an area of special fire hazard was present. The safety of persons exposed to a particular fire risk from a process was not relevant to a Fire Cetificate. On the otherhand a FRA, in addition to means of escape, does address exposure to a specific fire risk.
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline Tom Sutton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2287
Merseyside FRS
« Reply #32 on: May 11, 2007, 09:39:14 AM »
With regards to the original question I have been in contact with MFRS and the following is there response.

We are taking both a reactive and proactive approach. Planning and Building Regs are being treated normally. Issues picked up by Ops crews during incidents are reactively dealt with. In relation to our re-inspection policy we are proactively working in this area, however, we are prioritising these inspections dealing with sleeping life risks first. Events etc are also being dealt with, proactively i.e. the likes of Mathew street festival, Grand National, Southport Air show and so on.
All my responses only apply to England and Wales and they are an overview of the subject, hopefully it will point you in the right direction and always treat with caution.

Offline jokar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1472
Merseyside FRS
« Reply #33 on: May 16, 2007, 10:03:56 AM »
twsutton, thank you for that response.