Author Topic: B.A. Whistle time  (Read 28267 times)

Offline fireftrm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 673
B.A. Whistle time
« Reply #15 on: May 13, 2005, 05:42:26 PM »
BM999

I agree, around 80 bar would suggest a good level of safety built in, and as I said apply risk assessment. The example you gave  of the use of common sense is just that - after all RA is actually common sense. The over riding principles should be:

You should ensure that you return to fresh air so that your safety margin is untouched
You should utilise the air to the maximum benefit - using your DRA to determine the turnaround time.

The 'use half the air available' is only a guide. There is no normal job, though, so this is merely a recommendation on which to base your DRA and decisions that fall from it.
My posts reflect my personal views and beliefs and not those of my employer. If I offend anyone it is usually unintentional, please be kind. If it is intentional I guess it will be clear!

Offline burgermuncher999

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
B.A. Whistle time
« Reply #16 on: May 14, 2005, 09:25:06 AM »
Firetrm.
The only point i would add is that it can be all too easy for trainers to cover their arse by disregarding their practical experience upon entering training dept. What then occurs is that some can inadvertently regard the 'book' as the bible forgetting that the book was in fact derived from the lessons learnt in the real world. Where fairly inexperienced individuals are promoted into training as some form of development process what you can end up with is a situation where some rely on what is contained within 'the book' as opposed to having  a degree of actual workplace experience with which to balance the theory against practice. All i can say Firetrm is fight the good fight and continue to balance what you are given by the training dept against what you know to be real on the fireground.
Keep it real - keep it safe.

gggggggggg

  • Guest
B.A. Whistle time
« Reply #17 on: June 20, 2005, 06:51:29 AM »
[友情连接
铃声铃声下载下载铃声手机下载铃声手机铃声下载手机铃声免费铃声下载免费铃声手机铃声免费下载免费手机铃声三星手机铃声下载彩信免费彩信免费彩信下载 彩信下载彩信铃声彩信铃声下载 彩信图片下载手机彩信下载彩信动画图片待机图片 铃声铃声下载    手机铃声下载   手机铃声免费铃声下载   免费铃声手机铃声免费下载   三星手机铃声下载和弦铃声    诺基亚铃声下载 诺基亚铃声   诺基亚手机铃声和弦铃声   三星铃声 铃声下载 371m彩信   midi铃声midi铃声下载特效铃声下载原唱铃声qq铃声mp3手机铃声诺基亚3100铃声下载联想手机铃声下载原唱铃声下载移动铃声下载铃声下载单音铃声搞笑铃声 mid铃声下载手机特效铃声单音铃声下载和弦铃声手机铃声图片下载手机特效铃声下载短信铃声 移动手机铃声下载手机和弦铃声cect手机铃声下载彩信铃声诺基亚3120铃声下载和旋铃声下载原声铃声下载铃声图片诺基亚免费铃声下载免费和弦铃声下载 免费mp3铃声下载免费和弦铃声三星铃声免费下载免费mp3铃声  诺基亚免费铃声 手机铃声免费下 免费铃声图片下载  免费特效铃声下载 免费三星手机铃声 midi铃声免费下载 三星免费铃声 免费手机和弦铃声  诺基亚3100免费铃声 和弦铃声下载mp3铃声下载 mp3手机铃声  手机mp3铃声下载三星手机铃声 诺基亚铃声 诺基亚手机铃声下载 诺基亚手机铃声  手机特效铃声 手机特效铃声下载 移动手机铃声下载  移动铃声 原唱铃声下载  手机原唱铃声下载  nokia铃声 nokia手机铃声下载 nokia手机铃声 搞笑铃声下载 搞笑手机铃声 搞笑手机铃声下载 免费搞笑铃声下载 nec手机铃声 nec免费手机铃声 单音铃声下载 手机单音铃声下载   手机单音铃声 波导手机铃声下载 波导铃声下载 波导手机铃声  nokia铃声下载 tcl手机铃声下载 tcl铃声下载 tcl手机铃声 摩托罗拉铃声下载  摩托罗拉手机铃声  摩托罗拉铃声 联想手机铃声下载  联想手机铃声 联想铃声下载 lg手机铃声下载   lg手机铃声免费下载 lg手机铃声  海尔手机铃声下载   海尔手机铃声 海尔铃声下载  夏新手机铃声下载  夏新手机铃声  夏新铃声下载  托普手机铃声下载  托普手机铃声   托普铃声下载  迪比特手机铃声下载  迪比特铃声下载   迪比特手机铃声  康佳手机铃声下载  康佳手机铃声  康佳铃声下载  nec手机铃声下载  nec铃声下载   松下手机铃声下载  松下手机铃声  松下手机铃声下载[/url[url=http://yidong256.nease.net/256/yd120.htm]  铃声  飞利浦手机铃声下载  飞利浦手机铃声  飞利浦铃声下载  铃声  铃声  铃声  铃声  铃声  铃声  铃声铃声铃声下载下载铃声手机铃声下载手机铃声免费铃声下载手机铃声免费下载免费铃声三星手机铃声下载联通铃声下载mp3铃声 mp3铃声mp3铃声下载诺基亚铃声下载免费手机铃声和弦铃声三星铃声下载三星手机铃声特效铃声诺基亚手机铃声下载和弦铃声下载诺基亚铃声联通铃声三星铃声  联通手机铃声midi铃声cdma铃声下载波导手机铃声下载mp3手机铃声 midi铃声下载 诺基亚手机铃声特效铃声下载tcl手机铃声下载联想手机铃声下原唱铃声 摩托罗拉铃声下载 mp3手机铃声下载移动铃声下载 mid铃声下载dma手机铃声下载mid铃声nokia铃声下载搞笑铃声qq铃声原唱铃声下载 诺基亚3100铃声下载 和旋铃声nec手机铃声下载单音铃声海尔手机铃声下载单音铃声下载tcl铃声下载

Offline burgermuncher999

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
B.A. Whistle time
« Reply #18 on: June 20, 2005, 10:16:35 AM »
Absolutely.

Offline Kingy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
B.A. Whistle time
« Reply #19 on: February 14, 2008, 12:14:21 AM »
The time of whistle is totally irrelevant to the BA wearer. He/She has no idea of time during an incident.
Good wear planning is essential, ie; regular guage checks and following all recognised procedures.
If going in to a "normal" 3 bed semi with 200/190 bar then you can safely say that the likely hood of them staying in that building for their whole working duration is very unlikely.(unless its going like a train!)
If however the building is bigger and more complex then wear planning becomes an even greater necessity.
Before door openings guage check, change of levels guage check, finding casualties guage check.
All personel should in training excersises be practising honing this skill of wear planning.
Also in an earlier thread the ECO was mentioned perhaps being "the new boy", personally the responsibilties for an ECO can be more important than the BA teams. We should try and get away from this thought process that the job of Entry Control is a menial task at an incident.

Offline Chunty

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
B.A. Whistle time
« Reply #20 on: February 14, 2008, 10:46:19 PM »
If this is todays' subject then I have come in at the right time. I am a BAI and I've just got home after running a BA guideline drill.

I totally agree with the over-riding comment above that those that have gone before and tragically in some cases lost their lives, have been significant contributors to the procedures and equipment we use today and we shouldn't forget that or allow ourselves as individuals, regardless of the policies of the organisations we work for, forget that solemn fact.

With regard to turn round times; at today's exercise this issue was raised by the two members of the third team to enter. They were engaged in a methodical search using 6m personal line working off a pre-laid main guideline. Due to the complex layout of the smoke-logged structure being used it was a painfully slow process and by the time they had covered just twenty metres longitudally off the guideline the number two in the team was concerned that his cylinder contents were at the level when he would normally be expecting to turn around and head out. He was within 10 bar of the team leaders contents who took the decision to continue with the search pattern much to the disgruntlement of his number two.

During debrief the issue was raised again and I could only praise the team leader for considering that yes, you might normally consider turning around at the point the number two indicated but the pragmatics of the task they were engaged in meant that turning around, traversing the guideline back twenty metres to the EP would barely use a third of the air consumed during the methodical progress in to the structure.

However they were out before TOW and I wouldn't have been impressed with the ECO or the team leader if they weren't. As stated before the problem with TOW is that the BA team can't measure this and if they don't have telemetry or reliable radio comms (so far in this job I've never experienced consistently reliable radio comms?) there's no way of knowing or being advised by the ECO. In this case there's only one call the ECO can make if playing by the rules; rules born from the loss of firefighters past.