I know all this and still think its negligable. Kitchens use fossil fuels to generate heat, they produce varying amounts of waste oil/plastic/food. Having to dispose of some contaminated oil (most go through loads of oil anyway) as a one off event is such a drop in the ocean compared to the larger negative effect of even just that one kitchen and in the grand scheme of things, industrial kitchens are pretty low down the priority list of environmental problems.
How far to we take this? How do we measure it? How much fuel is used to make and tranport each systems components, how green are the factories where they were made? What was the carbonfootprint of the R&D to develop these systems? How recyclable are the system components?
I would guess that any system need only extinguish 1 fire to bring 100 times moreenvironmental benefit than all r&d, transport, disposal and all others negative effects. But I can't confirm this with and formulae. So I don't think splitting hairs between systems is necessary. Unless of course we can measure it. Can you?
Chris
(composter, recycler, greenpeace member and general environmental good guy)