« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: PAS 79  (Read 4819 times)

Offline Mr. P

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 685
PAS 79
« on: October 22, 2009, 11:11:06 AM »
Homer Simpson moment...

What is full title of PAS 79 please?  Have 'lost' my 'old' copy and trying to find another, but my usual route of supply does not come up with anything from just that

Thanks in anticipation  :-\
Logged

Offline Username

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: PAS 79
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2009, 11:32:25 AM »
"PAS 79 Fire Risk Assessment - Guidance and a recommended methodology"
Logged

Offline Mr. P

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 685
Re: PAS 79
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2009, 02:07:53 PM »
Mucho Gratis, simples when you think about it ;)
Logged

Offline Mushy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
Re: PAS 79
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2009, 03:04:15 PM »
....and for those that give a  ****  :)

Publicly Available Specification

dunno what 79 means
Logged

Davo

  • Guest
Re: PAS 79
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2009, 04:16:08 PM »
Mushy

It means either-
a) there are 78 others out there somewhere: or
b) it took 79 goes to get it right ;D

davo
on second thoughts b) cannot be right or the revision in 2006 ish (I didn't buy it) would be PAS80  ;)
Logged

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: PAS 79
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2009, 05:25:19 PM »
Quote from: Davo on October 26, 2009, 04:16:08 PM
Mushy

It means either-
a) there are 78 others out there somewhere: or
b) it took 79 goes to get it right ;D

davo
on second thoughts b) cannot be right or the revision in 2006 ish (I didn't buy it) would be PAS80  ;)
Or the age of the person who wrote it?
Logged
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline jokar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1472
Re: PAS 79
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2009, 07:47:33 PM »
Was going to be 999 but the FSC stole it and it had to have another title.
Logged

Offline Clevelandfire 3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
Re: PAS 79
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2009, 11:59:10 PM »
It was going to be called pas 69 but the panel thought that sounded a bit too racey
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »