Author Topic: PAS 79:2012– Fire Risk Assessment. Guidance and a recommended methodology  (Read 33209 times)

Offline colin todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
  • Civilianize enforcement -you know it makes sense.
    • http://www.cstodd.co.uk
Be pleased to help, Kel. I await your call.
Colin Todd, C S Todd & Associates

Offline Steven N

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Please what are Cb's?
These are my views and not the views of my employer

Offline Golden

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 486
Hi Steven, they are the certification bodies such as these for the BAFE scheme

http://www.bafe.org.uk/uploads/DOC50462A6CD9D4D.pdf

and Warrington (I believe) is the only one for the FRACS scheme.

Offline William 29

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
    • http://www.tfsltd.net
Please what are Cb's?

and all this time I thought it stood for Colin's Boys? ;)

Offline Clevelandfire 3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
No boys is wrong

Ive nothing against pas79 its a good tool but the inexperience can just use it as a tick box form without padding it out with justifying statements IMHO of course

Offline AndyLeather

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: PAS 79:2012– Fire Risk Assessment. Guidance and a recommended methodology
« Reply #35 on: November 28, 2012, 04:30:39 PM »
I have been a fan of the PAS79 template since the last update (2007), having "upgraded" to the 2012 version I am struggling with the templates in Adobe format great that they are easier to handle/fill but I cant print as standard pdf's or save as standard pdfs due to the restrictions/file/format, any suggestions?
We send all our FRA's out electronically as pdf's so cant do this now?  Also sometimes a picture will demonstrate a 1,00 words so again struggling to place these in the document?  Any help would be appreciated, spoke with BSI but not getting any joy after several phone calls.

Offline Tom W

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 603
Re: PAS 79:2012– Fire Risk Assessment. Guidance and a recommended methodology
« Reply #36 on: November 29, 2012, 09:23:48 AM »
I have been a fan of the PAS79 template since the last update (2007), having "upgraded" to the 2012 version I am struggling with the templates in Adobe format great that they are easier to handle/fill but I cant print as standard pdf's or save as standard pdfs due to the restrictions/file/format, any suggestions?
We send all our FRA's out electronically as pdf's so cant do this now?  Also sometimes a picture will demonstrate a 1,00 words so again struggling to place these in the document?  Any help would be appreciated, spoke with BSI but not getting any joy after several phone calls.

Sounds like you shouldn't be a fan of it then Andy. I think writing and recording is a personal thing, a standardised format is a good idea as many people need a starting point but surely you should just use it as a guidance and take the time to write your own one where you can put pictures where you want etc

Offline Clevelandfire 3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
Re: PAS 79:2012– Fire Risk Assessment. Guidance and a recommended methodology
« Reply #37 on: November 30, 2012, 01:10:49 AM »
after paying a pretty penny to buy PAS 79 are you serious piglet

Offline Tom W

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 603
Re: PAS 79:2012– Fire Risk Assessment. Guidance and a recommended methodology
« Reply #38 on: November 30, 2012, 09:54:02 AM »
I haven't bought the new one, sorry Colin.

Why would you not want to adapt it to make it more bespoke for your needs?

Why put a extension on a house if you've already bought a perfectly good one?

Offline colin todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
  • Civilianize enforcement -you know it makes sense.
    • http://www.cstodd.co.uk
Re: PAS 79:2012– Fire Risk Assessment. Guidance and a recommended methodology
« Reply #39 on: December 01, 2012, 11:12:57 PM »
Thomas, for you a copy is available at authors discount.
Colin Todd, C S Todd & Associates

Offline Steven N

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: PAS 79:2012– Fire Risk Assessment. Guidance and a recommended methodology
« Reply #40 on: December 02, 2012, 05:42:24 PM »
Hi Steven, they are the certification bodies such as these for the BAFE scheme

http://www.bafe.org.uk/uploads/DOC50462A6CD9D4D.pdf

and Warrington (I believe) is the only one for the FRACS scheme.
Thank you Golden & apologies for the long time to respond.
These are my views and not the views of my employer

Offline longjohn

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 71
I have been a fan of the PAS79 template since the last update (2007), having "upgraded" to the 2012 version I am struggling with the templates in Adobe format great that they are easier to handle/fill but I cant print as standard pdf's or save as standard pdfs due to the restrictions/file/format, any suggestions?
We send all our FRA's out electronically as pdf's so cant do this now?  Also sometimes a picture will demonstrate a 1,00 words so again struggling to place these in the document?  Any help would be appreciated, spoke with BSI but not getting any joy after several phone calls.
quote]
Can't you just use your 2007 Word template and make the necessary ammendents, that way you can use your own fonts, add pictures etc. If you have, like me purchased 2012 then surely that is permissable?