I wrote this on another forum but I am interested to hear people's view on this, in respect of modernisation and the appointment of civvies into roles within the fire & rescue service why do we overlook serving firefighters from non local authority brigades for transfers? Just for the record I am a serving wholetime firefighter.
"I know a couple of lads that were RAF firefighters that have transfered across, I feel sorry for the lads & lasses in the the RAF Fire Brigade as I have read a few times on here that certain people dont believe their training is up to scratch etc... I have to say that they do the same training in respect of home office standards, FS training manual, NVQ, operational procedures etc.. If I were a Chief fire officer I would not hesitate to transfer in one of these firefighters as i would do any other.
If the argument for not bringing them in is experience then why do recruit people off the street? these firefighters will have to attend development centres to assess their levels and get whatver training they may or may not require just as if I went from one brigade to another.
We appoint civvies with no fire service experiance in deputy chief fire officer jobs but we dont appoint firefighters with the same training standards!? it just doesn't make any sense to me.
On the forces thing I would rather have an ex squaddie on my watch with discipline and an attitude for work any day. If they have fire service experiance then why not transfer them in and well done to the brigades that do it already. Lets be honest brothers and sisters the rank to role is changing our service and in the not to distant future Firefighters from all areas of this job (Forces / airport / industry etc..) will be transfering directly across and probably us going the other way if we wanted (maybe not the forces though! )
If they prove they have the training etc... I for one will welcome them in.
I await the backlash.... "