I would like to seek the forums views on the following,
A fire occurred within a caravan which was parked within a private dwellings’ garden adjacent to the house.
The fire spread into the house causing considerable damage. It was ascertained by the fire crews that within the house lived an owner and son, who let out 2 rooms only, and there were also 2 caravans located adjacent to the house each housing 1 person, who were allowed to use the facilities within the house. (Bathroom, kitchen)
I am assuming that the owner has deliberately kept the figure down to 2 persons within the house to avoid the need to have an HMO license, and whatever fire safety measures that would go along with this.
There is now an argument between different departments regarding whether or not this constitutes an HMO, due to the 2 persons currently residing in the caravans using the house facilities.
Fire Service view is no, as the persons are not actually staying/nor sleeping in the house.
My questions are
1 – Due to the fact that this so called domestic house owner has taken in 2 paying “lodgers” would that not strictly speaking class this house as a “relevant premises”? And come under fire legislation both north and south of the border? And no doubt then “possibly” require the need for at least a Part 6, Grade D - LD2 fire detection system?
2 – Even if there was only 1 paying “lodger” staying in the house, would you consider that strictly speaking should also come under the terms of being a “relevant premises”? As it’s not being used as domestic premises then. ( at what point do we say it’s a relevant premises?)
3 – The caravans that are being utilized in the garden for paying residents, should they really be classed as “relevant premises” and appropriate fire safety measures taken by the owner?
Below is an extract from both the RR (FSO) & the Fire (Scotland) Act for domestic premises definitions.
RR(FSO)
“domestic premises” means premises occupied as a private dwelling (including any garden,
yard, garage, outhouse, or other appurtenance of such premises which is not used in common
by the occupants of more than one such dwelling);
Fire (Scotland) Act
“domestic premises” means premises occupied as a private dwelling (including a stair, passage, garden, yard, garage, outhouse or other appurtenance of such premises which is used in common by the occupants of more than one such dwelling); but does not include premises such as are mentioned in subsection (5).
I have been advised that Under the fire safety order a domestic premises is a premises that is not shared, so a shared house would be covered by the order, but I couldn’t see that is what the definition above is actually saying. It seems to me its talking about the (bits in brackets) not being shared. Any views appreciated.