Yes Chris so would I.
Please Chris and Kurnal forget I ever mentioned a nuclear power point..I will never mention one again.......I was just trying to make the point that the frequency of the reviews should be proportionate to the risk.......and leave Mrs Prendergast alone too!
Phill I think you like many others have hit the nail on the head in that the review frequency should be proportionate to the risk. The problems as I see it is convinving the responsible person that they have a risk and that a file full of papers is not like waving the old fire certificate and saying I have one go away. Even harder is convincing responsible persons that they have to act on the assessment and not just file it away.
One case that I know of was a school, where the risk assessment was undertaken which would involve some considerable work, noises were made that budgets would be sought and work considered. Nothing was done, reviews were declined and it was not until the local FSO paid a visit that the RP even thought of doing the work in the assessment. The RP then realised that it was his rear end on the line.