Author Topic: BS 5839  (Read 10523 times)

Offline jokar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1472
Re: BS 5839
« Reply #15 on: December 13, 2009, 02:18:21 PM »
Very probably not.  However, many are attempting to do so and following Tom Welland article on the way FRA's are dealing with the
RR(FS)O, CFOA have responded by issuing a statement about how both partie should work together to resolve issues about fire safety.  It is abit of a fudge to be honest IMHO, but at least within the article they agree that their is a problem to be resolved.

Graeme

  • Guest
Re: BS 5839
« Reply #16 on: December 13, 2009, 04:06:43 PM »
Apologies if this is a daft question but why is BS 5839 a code of practice and not legislation?

If you carry out work practices that are outside that of BS5839,  then would you be legally responsible to prove your work practices were sufficient.



people interpret some parts of 5839-1 in different ways. Making that law would cause headaches.

Offline Thomas Brookes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
Re: BS 5839
« Reply #17 on: December 14, 2009, 09:46:40 AM »
I sit on 4 of the BS fire alarm and detection committees, and I can confirm there are many people on it who are very knowledgeable with years of experience with in the industry. There is representation from all sorts of bodies and organisations including the Fire & Rescue services.

And this is the thing that gets on my goat, why do they bother if they are going to ignor what is decided, and often the reps from the F&R ask for certain things to be in it.

I recently had a meeting at my local Fire & Rescue offices, because they had told a client of mine that that BS are only recomendations and should be taken with a pinch of salt. At the meeting the officer denighed he had said that but then went on to tell me that he did not agree with them and would not ever tell some one to comply with a British Standard, because they were too safe and not cost effective, and then went on to tell me that quote " for gods sake BS5306 even states that you should always have two extinguishers". When I asked him why he thought that was in there, he said it was so companies could sell more extinguishers!!!.

I refuse to have a battle of wittts with an unarmed person.