Totally agree NT, but is this any riskier than your average domestic scenario?
In my experience residents are generally well supervised in these types of places. The staircase situation is unfortunate, but often trying to fiddle around with staircases can be costly and can mean you loose part or most of the lounge area.
So its trying to balance "quality of life" against "life safety" I guess.
I agree with your balancing quality of life-v-quality of safety issue and certainly the risk would be no greater than a domestic environment. I would actually consider the risk much less as this type of care environment is certainly much more controlled. I do not have a risk concern as that can be quite easily and reasonably controlled but a concern that the F&RS may not be persuaded that the risk is adequately controllable by such measures.
I have carried out a number of FRAs for this type of service provider but haven't yet come across an open plan issue. But be assured that in my neck of the woods the normal 12 months experienced IO will not be at all happy or satisfied if I assessed it as OK.
Hairy bummed and experienced IOs are fast disappearing