Author Topic: FSEG CROOM 2 Zone Model  (Read 5457 times)

Offline BLEVE

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
FSEG CROOM 2 Zone Model
« on: July 04, 2010, 12:48:24 PM »
Does anyone have any supporting documentation for this model?

Regards
Bleve

Offline Phoenix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 677
  • Get a bicycle. You will not live to regret it
    • MetaSolutions (Fire Safety Engineering) Ltd.
Re: FSEG CROOM 2 Zone Model
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2010, 09:40:19 PM »
I have associated notes in hard copy.  What are you after?

Stu


Offline BLEVE

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Re: FSEG CROOM 2 Zone Model
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2010, 10:04:38 PM »
A copy of the associated notes if poss, spoke with Dr Galea but no joy

Bleve

Offline Phoenix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 677
  • Get a bicycle. You will not live to regret it
    • MetaSolutions (Fire Safety Engineering) Ltd.
Re: FSEG CROOM 2 Zone Model
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2010, 11:32:59 AM »
Perhaps if you email me, we can discuss.

Stu


Offline Benzerari

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1391
    • http://benzerari.tripod.com/fas/
Re: FSEG CROOM 2 Zone Model
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2010, 11:39:06 AM »
Does anyone have any supporting documentation for this model?

Regards
Bleve

Not sure what you are after, as far as I know ' Zone Model ' is a very limited tool, fire field software like Smart-Fire is more beneficial, also in the C Room; how many vents are there, their sizes, ... etc???????

Offline BLEVE

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Re: FSEG CROOM 2 Zone Model
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2010, 11:52:08 AM »
Benz
Have a number of models.  I was asking because I had not come across C ROOM before and was contemplating putting together an article on basic models.


Offline John Webb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 838
Re: FSEG CROOM 2 Zone Model
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2010, 07:04:05 PM »
If it's a 2-zone model then there may be parallels with 'Radism' and the like developed by BRE and associates in the early 1990s. Has the advantage of needing much less 'number crunching' that a computational fluid dynamics based model and so doesn't need a large computer to run on (well, it didn't by the 1990s standards of the day!). Accuracy may be less, but I was able to match results in the computer model to within 10% of the results in experiments, which we thought was quite good at the time.
John Webb
Consultant on Fire Safety, Diocese of St Albans
(Views expressed are my own)

Offline BLEVE

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Re: FSEG CROOM 2 Zone Model
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2010, 07:24:22 PM »
Thanks for that John