Author Topic: (split topic) minimum requirements of fire safety for their residential block of flats under the RRO  (Read 34638 times)

Offline Clevelandfire 3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
I said id publically chastise any risk assessor who didnt understand the concept of hazard or risk. Civvy FSO and Nearlythere I happily declare that you are both officially incompetent you losers. You are to the field of risk assesment what england is to football.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2010, 12:07:15 AM by Clevelandfire 3 »

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
I said id publically chastise any risk assessor who didnt understand the concept of hazard or risk. Civvy FSO and Nearlythere I happily declare that you are both officially incompetent you losers. You are to the field of risk assesment what england is to football.
What England is to football?
Thats one heck of a chastisement CF3.
Would the distance between the posts be a hazard with the risk being that they would not get the ball between them?
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline CivvyFSO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
We have done nothing to deserve that comparison! Even if we had done the RA on the CLG buildings, we would still not have deserved THAT!

Midland Retty

  • Guest
Although it pains me to admit it, that was way below the belt Cleveland, even for you.

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Never mind people. On a brighter note I see the England netball team, ladies, has done well against the Aussies. England's sporting achievements are still up there :) :D ;D http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/netball/8525802.stm
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline kurnal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6489
    • http://www.peakland-fire-safety.co.uk
I said id publically chastise any risk assessor who didnt understand the concept of hazard or risk. Civvy FSO and Nearlythere I happily declare that you are both officially incompetent you losers. You are to the field of risk assesment what england is to football.
Cleveland3 I appreciate your comments are intended as ongoing banter but please can we all keep the banter within the Banter thread. If we allow it to spill into other threads it can be off putting for those interested in following the discussion and may put off less seasoned posters from having their say for fear of ridicule.

I know it will come across as do as I say not as I do but I am trying to turn over a new leaf myself!

Offline jokar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1472
Should not we be debating Fire Hazard and Fire Risk?  The term Fire hazard includes ignition sources and fuels as well as Oxygen and the fuels well, anything you like that burns.  Fire risk being the likelihood and severity of the burn process.

Midland Retty

  • Guest
You can do. But its just putting the word "fire" infront of already established terminology.

Is an ignition source a fire hazard on it's own? Is a fuel source a hazard on it's own? Or is it the combination of the fuel, heat / ignition source that constitutes the hazard ?

Offline Clevelandfire 3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
Its the combination of both Retty. Also sorry for any offence caused by my previous post. I think it was evident I was joking though.