Author Topic: BS5839-1 AFD grading  (Read 12163 times)

Offline Hi Tower

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
    • Hitower
BS5839-1 AFD grading
« on: August 04, 2010, 12:28:01 PM »
Can someone advise me if BS5839-1 contains advice on the grading of AFD?  I can readily find it in BS5839-6; but am puzzled of its ommission (or my failing eyesight) in BS5839-1.


Offline CivvyFSO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2010, 12:36:25 PM »
There is no grading in a part 1 system.

All detectors are hard wired + battery backup. All control equipment etc is done to the same standard. i.e. There is no 'cheap version' of a part 1 system. The main difference in the provision is via 'category'.

Offline Wiz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1591
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2010, 12:57:26 PM »
Further to Civvy's excellent reply. The Grades in Part 6 is more to do with the 'quality' (in terms of monitoring, power back-up etc. etc.) of equipment used in the system. Part 1 basically only has one level of 'quality' so there aren't any Grades.

The Category of system in both Parts gives you a recommendation of which areas in a building needs the equipment.


Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2479
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2010, 02:06:54 PM »
Absolutely - if you want a lower tech, lower cost system you have to use Part 6 kit, which of course isn't strictly meant for commercial use, but in smaller premises with a suitable risk assessment can be used (but it's the assessors neck on the line as they have to justify the deviation from the benchmark i.e. using a Part 1 system)
Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36

Offline Hi Tower

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
    • Hitower
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2010, 07:13:46 AM »
Quote
if you want a lower tech, lower cost system you have to use Part 6 kit, which of course isn't strictly meant for commercial use, but in smaller premises with a suitable risk assessment can be used (but it's the assessors neck on the line as they have to justify the deviation from the benchmark i.e. using a Part 1 system)

Can you explain why it isn't strictly meant for commercial premises?  In terms of risk many commercial premises will be lower risk than residential as people won't be sleeping there. 
and
are there any stats out there that show how many failures of alarms (each grade) have occurred over a period so that a determination of the risk can be calculated.

Lastly; what other factors need to be considered in terms of having a grade A over and above a C grade system if it can be proven there reliability is not detrimental?


Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #5 on: August 07, 2010, 08:09:14 AM »
I cannot now quote properly so have respond to ABs point about deviating from bench marks this way.
I cannot highlight the key areas in this text as I cannot now scroll down to and edit any text below the window. (Not very technical explanation) Is the website in meltdown?.

In short the guide allows for discretion so therefore using discretion is not a failure to follow guidance.

The BS does provide for deviation as contained in the following. A5 in particular.
 
4 Need for a fire alarm system
4.1 CommentaryThe need for a fire alarm system in any specific building will normally be determined by the authority
responsible for enforcing fire safety legislation in that building and/or by a fire risk assessment carried out by the owner, landlord, occupier(s) or employer(s), as appropriate. In general, it is appropriate to install some form of fire alarm system in virtually all buildings, other than very small premises that are relatively open-planned so that any fire will be quickly detected by occupants, who will be able to warn others by word
of mouth or simple mechanical devices such as hand-operated bells.
Manual fire alarm systems are often sufficient to satisfy legislation in workplaces in which no one sleeps.
Automatic fire detection is usually required by legislation to supplement the manual system in premises in
which people sleep. Automatic fire detection might also be necessary to satisfy legislation under the following circumstances:
a) where the automatic fire detection forms part of a fire engineering solution;
b) where fire protection systems, such as door closing facilities or smoke control systems, are to be operated
automatically in the event of fire;
c) where the low level of occupancy of a building, or part of a building, is such as to create the potential
for fire to prejudice means of escape by occupants before they are aware of the fire.
BS 5839-1:2002+A2:2008
10 © BSI 2008
Section 1
Automatic fire detection is also commonly used to protect property by ensuring the early attendance of the
fire service, as a result of the summoning of the brigade by occupants of the building or by transmission of
fire alarm signals to an alarm receiving centre from where the fire service will be summoned. Automatic fire
detection systems might, therefore, be required or recommended by the property insurers.
The early detection of fire by automatic means, and rapid summoning of the fire service, is also important
in premises in which people cannot readily be evacuated immediately in the event of fire (e.g. hospitals).
4.2 Recommendations
The following recommendations are applicable.
a) Where there is uncertainty regarding the need for a fire alarm system, or the Category of system that
should be used (see Clause 5) reference should be made, by the developer, potential purchaser or user, to
one or more of the following:
1) relevant part of BS 5588;
2) guidance documents that support fire safety legislation;
3) any authority responsible for enforcing fire safety legislation that applies to the premises;
4) the property insurer;
5) any relevant fire risk assessment.
b) The purchaser or user should ensure that the designer of a fire detection and alarm system is
adequately appraised of the objectives of the system and any relevant requirements of enforcing
authorities and insurers.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2010, 08:11:40 AM by nearlythere »
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline Hi Tower

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
    • Hitower
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2010, 02:40:40 PM »
NT

Thanks for the reply.  What I can see so far is that advice is given within the BS (particulary 4.2 a5) that allows the risk assessor to make a risk based decision on what level of coverage is deemed necessary.  The level of coverage meaning the category of AFD that is required.  What I want to make a risk assessment on is the grade of AFD.  For example, is there any statistics that show where a grade c AFD was installed opposed to grade A that loss of life or serious harm occurred?

I guess what i'm really trying to say to the salesman, BC or any other authority is what benefit will the money I spend on a higher spec model give me?  I need proof that the failure of grade c's have caused death or injury or that they regularly fail (which is picked up at service and maintenance) and therefore their reliance is sketchy; and if it is - why can such a grade be recommended to sleeping premises?

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #7 on: August 08, 2010, 02:52:25 PM »
Not sure of any research undertaken following fire HT but I suppose it is a case of providing detection in areas where there is an identified risk of a fire starting and so providing adequate warning to help ensure a successful evacuation.
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2479
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2010, 07:12:08 PM »
Quote
if you want a lower tech, lower cost system you have to use Part 6 kit, which of course isn't strictly meant for commercial use, but in smaller premises with a suitable risk assessment can be used (but it's the assessors neck on the line as they have to justify the deviation from the benchmark i.e. using a Part 1 system)

Can you explain why it isn't strictly meant for commercial premises?  In terms of risk many commercial premises will be lower risk than residential as people won't be sleeping there. 


Because Part 6 says "It does not apply to any premises used for purposes other than as a dwelling (e.g. small shops, factories or similar premises used solely as places of work)." and as our courts like to refer to the BS as benchmarks the assessor would have to justify why they thought a system that did not conform to Part 1 and was designed for use in dwellings only was satisfactory for a workplace.

I'm not saying that you can't or shouldn't use a Part 6 system of call points and smoke/heat alarms other than in a dwelling, just that you are far more likely to need to be able to justify why this was suitable and sufficient should the premises fall under enforcement

Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2010, 07:21:08 PM »
I think the question here AB is why, other than it saying so in the BS, would a part 6 system not be suitable?
What would you have to justify?
Other than probably zoning what does a Pt6 system not have to make it unsuitable for commercial use?
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline Tom Sutton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2287
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2010, 10:53:05 PM »
Can someone advise me if BS5839-1 contains advice on the grading of AFD?  I can readily find it in BS5839-6; but am puzzled of its omission (or my failing eyesight) in BS5839-1.

As already said it doesn't but maybe it should. I can see why it was introduced in part 6 because of the wide variety of residential premises, from the two up and two down to the mansion in the Cheshire countryside and all in between. Surely this applies to commercial premises to a lesser extent, from the High Street shop to Canary Wharf.

All my responses only apply to England and Wales and they are an overview of the subject, hopefully it will point you in the right direction and always treat with caution.

Offline Hi Tower

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
    • Hitower
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2010, 07:09:20 AM »
Quote
Other than probably zoning what does a Pt6 system not have to make it unsuitable for commercial use?
and in particualar what evidence is their around that shows grade c systems have been detrimental in their functioning to alert relevant persons in the event of a fire so that it warrants a grade a system?

Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2479
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2010, 07:01:50 PM »
I think the question here AB is why, other than it saying so in the BS, would a part 6 system not be suitable?
What would you have to justify?
Other than probably zoning what does a Pt6 system not have to make it unsuitable for commercial use?

It depends on the grade, non fire resistant cabling is permitted in a grade C system which is the most common type I've seen used in commercial premises - vast cost savings, but a lower level of redundancy than Part 1 systems (and unprotected cabling has been cited as contributing to alarm issues in some of the famous fires.)

I'm not against the use of the kit and based on the risk and the protected area to be within the maximum single zone size in Part 1 have even suggested it.
Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #13 on: August 10, 2010, 08:09:40 PM »
Rational answer AB. So you could consider it sufficiently justifiable to use a Pt6 in commercial premises in grade C circumstances?
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline Hi Tower

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
    • Hitower
Re: BS5839-1 AFD grading
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2010, 08:35:35 AM »
Quote
non fire resistant cabling is permitted in a grade C system which is the most common type I've seen used in commercial premises

AB:  Just to quantify your statement above are you saying that in most commercial businesses you visit that non fire resistant cabling has been used opposed to fire resistant cabling as required in a Grade A system.  Does this mean that most commercial businesses out there are ignoring BS5839-1 and installing grade c systems under a part 6? or is it i wonder in most cases fitted when the AFD is installed after the original build?

Either way it seems that deviation from the standard is regularly happening