Author Topic: Stratification  (Read 38584 times)

Offline BLEVE

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Re: Stratification
« Reply #75 on: August 16, 2011, 08:59:05 PM »
It isn't a clash at all.

BLEVE, T^2? shurely shome mishtake? t^2 perhaps? I expect better from you.

Tsk Tsk, Lower case t when inserted into a formula and Upper case T when described in text ;D

Offline SamFIRT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
  • Looking for the truth
Re: Stratification
« Reply #76 on: August 16, 2011, 09:48:29 PM »
Quote
Now, I think we should all be able to agree* and just enjoy a quiet evening overlooking the Dordogne

The Dordogne is beautiful ………… agreed  8)

Just got back from eastern med myself

Didn’t see any stratification though.  :D
Sam

Offline BLEVE

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Re: Stratification
« Reply #77 on: August 16, 2011, 10:16:08 PM »
How about inversion

Offline Wiz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1591
Re: Stratification
« Reply #78 on: August 17, 2011, 10:19:18 AM »
I've learned virtually nothing about smoke stratification from this thread other than it is simple to explain the effect, but difficult to calculate the likelihood of when and where it might occur, and that there is no agreement on this thread as to the mathematics used in any such calculations and of which criteria needs to be taken into account. No wonder BS5839-1 skims over it so lightly!