Author Topic: Trade body criticises extinguisher removal  (Read 4596 times)

Offline William 29

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
    • http://www.tfsltd.net
Trade body criticises extinguisher removal
« on: November 21, 2011, 01:49:06 PM »
I thought we had put this one to bed and the indusrty was getting the idea?  Apparently not so!

Trade body criticises extinguisher removal
16 November 2011


Residents in Richmond have been told that portable fire extinguishers have been removed from the common parts of their housing blocks for their own safety, following the findings of a fire risk assessment.
The Independent Fire Engineering & Distributors Association has questioned the housing association’s decision. Its chairman, Nigel Walton, said:
“IFEDA would question what available evidence demonstrates that the removal of fire extinguishers would enhance residents’ safety. Providing the correct type of fire extinguisher is in place, as determined by British Standard 5306 part 8, the likelihood of using the wrong type of fire extinguisher on a fire is minimal.
“It would be unlikely that dry powder extinguishers would be used in communal evacuation routes, for example, a stairwell. Therefore the risk from obscured vision and breathing difficulties due to dust is minimal. Surely the sensible option would be to inform residents about the practical use of handling a fire extinguisher, rather than removing them altogether.”
A spokesperson for Richmond Housing Partnership told info4fire.com:
“We take the safety of our residents very seriously and as such we are one of only a few housing providers to use a FRACS (Fire Risk Assessor Certification Scheme) accredited fire risk assessor to manage our fire risk assessment programme. The expert advice we have received is to remove fire extinguishers from the common areas of our general needs housing blocks. This advice has been endorsed by the London Fire Brigade.
“Fire extinguishers used incorrectly can add to the danger created by a fire and may put the person using the extinguisher at risk.”
Putting his oar in, Daily Mail columnist Richard Littlejohn fanned the flames of the debate. In a piece headlined: Now Burn to Death in Safety, the outspoken columnist wrote: “I thought I’d heard it all. Fire extinguishers removed on elf’n’safety grounds. That really does take the biscuit.”

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: Trade body criticises extinguisher removal
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2011, 02:45:19 PM »
Well the trade body would same way that turkeys would criticise a Xmas dinner.
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2479
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Re: Trade body criticises extinguisher removal
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2011, 11:27:03 PM »
They shot themselves in the foot in their statement:

“It would be unlikely that dry powder extinguishers would be used in communal evacuation routes, for example, a stairwell."

Exactly the point! That's why they were removed, no risk to the common areas and no desire to encourage people back into a burning flat after they had already reached the relative safety of a protected route.
Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36