I would ask myself, how is the paint ever likely to get involved in a fire?
And, if it may become involved then what effect will it have?
If the building is in an area where kids are always playing with matches, crime rates are high and bags of rubbish and other combustible goods are regularly left in the protected routes then I might consider it a reasonable assumption that a fire might occur in a protected route.
If it is in an area with a low crime rate and the premises are secured against unauthorised entry and there is no known history of arson then it might be reasonable to assume that the risk of a fire involving a protected route is extremely low, indeed low enough to require no remedial action. Bear in mind that protected routes are generally well trusted in residential buildings.
If the former scenario is the case and a fire in a protected route is reasonably foreseeable then you have to think about how much worse that fire might be because of the wall coating. If the paint is in good condition, as you say it is, then I would consider it unlikely that it will contribute towards making the fire significantly worse than it would be anyway. Again, it could be that no remedial action is required.
(Another matter to bear in mind is that sometimes these areas are carpeted with carpets that are capable for spreading fire and we miss that and get stressed out about a bit of gloss paint on the walls.)
Having said that, if you deem that no action is required immediately, it might be worth suggesting that at the next redecoration they use more fire safety friendly paint.