f you had an old business unit located under a railway arch with 6 multi-purpose rooms used for beauty therapy, etc. which discharge into a small internal lobby area and then from this internal lobby area you had to go through an office room/waiting area to be able to get to the entrance lobby which contains the electric meter in a cupboard and out to a place of safety. The furthest distance to travel would be 17metres from the furthest point to the place of safety. There is automatic smoke detection in each room/lobby.
Max of 15 people only one way out. Complies with all the guidance in relation to max travel dist, small number of occupants and early warning via mains smoke detection.
The only slight concern that it is not inner rooms direct to the outer room, so in theory by having a lobby you lose that close proximity and have 2 doors between the inner and outer room instead of one. My own thoughts are that this layout is okay provided a clear path is kept with adequate emergency lighting, as the distance is okay and early warning is provided by detection and possibly somebody sat in the outside room. So regardless of close proximity the smoke detection will give early warning. Any comments please. I appreciate guidance is only guidance but I have come across situations where it has been used to try to undermine pragmatic decisions