Nearlythere: The sign was next to the intumescent strips and cold smoke seal and I had already taken this in to account.
William 29: I am aware of the status of BS 5588, what I was alluding to verify in my comments, was the range of documents researched for this question.
Again I was not looking at ‘cherry picking’ I was simply stating that all of these documents used to sing from the same hymn sheet.
The sign is not a show stopper and it would be ludicrous to ask for it to be removed and replaced with the ‘normal’ signs, that question was not even contemplated or even thought of asking an RP.
Thank you Tom back you are on track now with my original question.
So the vertical sign may not be compliant, it begs the question of how the vertical signs have been introduced........the good idea concept without consultation? Did it need consultation? Should it be compliant?
Are any BCO’s Approved Inspectors or even the nice Inspecting Officers in uniform (or not) out there have a view?
In my view the sign does have a use, it is more aesthetically pleasing to the eye in let’s say a heritage premises.
But in certain circumstances it is superfluous, because it would not be seen i.e. on an outwardly opening door which opens on to a dedicated escape staircase (not in normal daily use to get from A to B) which has been wedged open on one of our hot summer days.
The only reason the questions are posed, is because I am sure, very soon the vertical sign will become the norm and me being an inquisitive person wants to know why the change and is it correct?