Audibility in flats for evacuation

[Fishy]

?

[colin todd]

Ok Fish face I am going to have to help you. You do recall Holroyd, who was 943849849084802802842  times better than Dam Jude?  And the so called Holyroyd divide that we have had ever since? The clue lies in the divide.

[Fishy]

Well... when I researched Holroyd I did glean that there were recommendations in his report regarding the optimum size of a fire authority. 

I suppose that it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that the Laird of Rushmore might have observed that there is a difference in the Scottish model for this, compared to other parts of the UK... or am I barking up the wrong caber?

[colin todd]

Not even close Fish Face. You need to address the question. Another clue?

[Seetek]

The Holroyd report recommended that fire safety legislation should be divided into two main branches; one dealing with new buildings (and building works in the form of extending or materially altering an existing building), while the other deals with occupied premises.

The ?address? would be Rose & Crown which led to the first ?fire? legislation (FPA1971), possibly.

[colin todd]

The key point is that Fish Face said that (and I quote):
I do wish people would realise that just because someone from a fire and rescue service has said they don't object to something, that doesn't make it right,

Now what would Holroyd have to say more specifically about that. That is what I want to know. Fish Face, am I going to have to give you another clue?