Graeme, I'm sure David means you have to lift the carpets up to gain access to the floorboards, not just to 'hide' the cables under it!!!
A number of years ago I carried out a review for a County Council and it revealed that the costs, over a five year period, for installing and maintaining a wireless fire alarm system were nearly 50% higher than for a comparable wired analogue addressable version. These costs included all equipment, installation, commissioning, servicing (including one complete battery replacement visit) and fault repairs.
However, this review related to;
(i) A RAFT system which,as far as we were aware, was the first wireless fire alarm system installed in an Elderly Persons Home anywhere in the U.K. and it had to be specially manufactured to comply with the requirements of BS5839 part 1 (which at that time mentioned wired systems only). Modern wireless systems are definitely cheaper and surely more reliable(!) now.
(ii) The installation was carried out on a non-listed fairly modern building that was undergoing complete refurbishment at the time of installation, and was not being used at the time of the refurbishment/fire alarm system installation. The wired system costs would have been higher if the building had been occupied.
In my experience, whilst the costs of installing a modern wireless system against a wired system are very close (except where the building is 'listed' or occupied, where wireless could be cheaper), the costs to maintain and repair will be much higher over a period of time.
However the savings made in installing a wireless system in a listed or occupied building bring the overall costs, even with future maintenance and repair costs, very close to a wired system.