Author Topic: RRFSO Guidance  (Read 11546 times)

Offline harley

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
RRFSO Guidance
« on: July 19, 2007, 10:51:19 AM »
Is there any laymans guidance available on the RRFSO itself, rather than the premises guides to risk assessment?
A layman's guide to the Articles (and how they are being interpreted by the enforcing authority and the courts) would be very useful.
Thanks in advance.

Offline Mr. P

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 685
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2007, 11:01:16 AM »

Offline harley

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2007, 11:34:16 AM »
Thanks for the reply Mr P, but where exactly is the explanatory guidance to the Articles of the Order rather than than the premises guides?

Midland Retty

  • Guest
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2007, 11:54:53 AM »
You might struggle to find what you are looking for to be honest.

Is there anythig specific you are unsure about and would like further guidance with or is it more just a general thing you were looking for?

Offline harley

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2007, 03:48:44 PM »
Thanks for getting back Retty. Its a general thing I'm afraid, the translation of legalese to english in words that ordinary punters will understand. Tricky eh?

Offline Pip

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2007, 04:52:53 PM »
we are not meant to understand-it is to keep lawyers in business by going to court /advising us.

Offline jokar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1472
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2007, 05:02:40 PM »
What is it that is not understood?  There is no interpretation of the Order you just have to do what it states.  If you have a specific query please e mail me and I will respond.

Offline John Webb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 838
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2007, 07:54:57 PM »
Harley,
I understand that when the "new" legislation was being sorted out, it was decided that the area-specific guides was a better approach than trying to make an all-inclusive single guide. I am not certain that this approach has worked as well as it could do, partly because each guide still has to cover a very wide range of buildings.

There has therefore been no official commentry written on the RR(FS)O itself. Basically it says "There is a 'Responsible person' for every building/facility/workplace/site open to the public; that person will carry out, or will arrange to have carried out, a Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) and will see that precautions are carried out to reduce the risk of fire as a result of that FRA."
So attention has been concentrated on the FRA and educating people in carrying these out and implementing any findings therefrom. There is plenty of guidance available from people like the Fire Protection Association  www.thefpa.co.uk   www.mid-career-collage.ac.uk etc. either via courses, publications or DVDs.

Once 'case law' starts coming in from court cases it may be that someone will put together something on the RR(FS)O as a legal document.

There has been quite a bit of discussion in this forum about aspects of the Order as well, of course.
John Webb
Consultant on Fire Safety, Diocese of St Albans
(Views expressed are my own)

Offline val

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2007, 08:48:32 PM »
If you can wait until september, the CLG will publish the 'enforcers' guidance'. Whilst this may not be plain English it will help to understand how the government want the fire safety order interpreted. Unfortunately some of the more tricky questions will remain unanswered until, as Colin Todd calls them, strange men in tights and funny wigs get their say.

Offline jokar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1472
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2007, 09:55:00 AM »
If it is as unreadable as the drafts have been, I would not bother.  It is the tricky bits that need an answer.

Offline Pip

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2007, 01:59:05 PM »
Quote from: jokar
If it is as unreadable as the drafts have been, I would not bother.  It is the tricky bits that need an answer.
exactly-
tricky bits written by lawyers to be understood only by lawyers=lawyers continuous employment

Offline val

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
RRFSO Guidance
« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2007, 10:36:03 PM »
Jokar

The latest version is much better though the tricky questions cannot be answered by the executive...that is the role of the Courts.
Government write legislation...judges decide what it means!