Thanks once again Prof. K
The good, the bad and the ugly of the problem is that my vision is going misty reading information about this. I'm turning every which way for a soution and if I fail I will be unforgiven and maybe considered a silly clint for raising it.
From all the comments and advice given, I am coming to the conclusion that these are definitely firefighting ventilation shafts. Whilst the middle one is not strictly in a satircase, it is close to a staircase and in an adjacent lift lobby.
I believe the motor-driven vents at the top of the shaft to be manually controlled and I presume that the firefighters might operate these when they decide that doing so won't fuel any fire. They can then open the access windows to the shaft(s) at any level for use in clearing smoke if they decide it is necessary.
The problem with installing automatic detection is the whole top, of at least the staircase shafts, contains an opening louvre. When I was there they were open. If this was just because someone has forgotten to close them I don't know (could this fuel a fire?). Obviously installing a detector brings all the problems of it being affected by water, dust etc. coming through the louvre. If we provide some arrangement to protect it from the elements this will partially block the shaft (reduce the venting effect?).
The good news is, that whatever the decision is regarding the top of these shafts, we will be providing automatic smoke detection within 1.5 metres of each of the shaft access facilities at every level.
I don't know any more about the original intended design or use of the building and I suspect the local authority owners do not know either. The problem is that I get so much conflicting information from people who I think should know about even the most simple things on a site, that I lose confidence in what they are telling me! I will try to find out more information and have a better look at the things you have highlighted on my next site visit.
The fire risk assessment carried out on this building does not mention these shafts in any way. It does seem to be advising that disabled refugees should be provided at or near the vent shaft access facilities (I don't know if this is good or bad! Will the firefighters trample on the disabled?).
Advice from the local fire officer, so far, has not proven to be helpful. We have concluded that he might not really know and therefore won't commit himself.
Thanks for all your advice. I will let you know if we find out anything more.