In a residential block of flats that uses an electro magnetic door entry system (will fail safe in power failure). System is not linked into a fire alarm system. Door has a push to exit button to release the door. Do you think a green box should be installed to protect against earth frame faults or a faulty switch?
If the door relies solely on a button to exit the button then surely there is potential for failure trapping people in the building. If so, as a first step it should obviously be linked to automatically release on fire alarm. Secondly, a green break glass would be essential according to some advice, although it will probably be abused and the door left unlocked for all to enter.
The liklihood of 'earth frame faults' would require an electrically conductive doorframe but many people would advise the use of a double-pole green break glass unit in all circumstances in the hope that any electrical short likely to by-pass the switch of a single pole green break glass will also cause a 'dead short' of the lock power supply, blow the power supply output fuse and fail-safe release the door.
I understand that there is a new BS that may apply to these sort of doors. I haven't seen it yet but I would guess it will include the recommendation for a double-pole green break glass unit. Anyone else seen this BS yet?
I personally feel that there is a lot of overkill in some advice offered for the emergency releasing of fire doors in as much as the attempt to reduce the risk to zero can be ridiculously expensive and, at the end of the day, it is impossible to make these sort of doors totally fail-safe.
With reference to the document ( found at the link:
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/efd/maintenance/f … TN_001.pdf ) suggested, in an earlier posting, as a point of reference, I would ask FireNet members their opinion on the following:
1) Is everything recommended in the documents supported by a BS or other recognised official recommendation, or does it contain elements over and above these on the basis that the document issuing body feels 'it would be nice to have these things as well'. If they do this, does anyone else agree that it could and does cause much confusion.
2) One of the documents is issued by LFEPA. Apart from premises still requiring a fire certificate, what authority do LFEPA have to demand compliance with their own guidance notes?
3) The LFEPA document clause 2.4 states ' Under no circumstances is an electronic door release to be connected to a local fire alarm sounder circuit. In all cases, the recommendations within Clause 19 of BS 5839 part 1: are to be observed'.
Can anyone see any relevance between the first sentence and the second sentence of the LFEPA document clause 2.4?