Author Topic: Hendersons Fire - new information  (Read 16948 times)

Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2490
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Hendersons Fire - new information
« on: August 20, 2008, 10:06:51 PM »
Those of you who know me on this forum know that as well as being somewhat of a historian on fire extinguishers I like to research the major legislation influencing fires over the years, many of which occurred before my time so I don't have my own contemporary information.

I've managed to fill gaps on most of them other than Henderson's for which I only have the few lines trotted out on several fire safety power points.


Fortunately thanks to the Liverpool Record office and the kind permission of HM Coroner I have had released to me access to a lot of the contemporary information from the time from the Merseyside Fire Brigade reports and investigation and the Summary from the Inquest.

This amounts to almost 100 photos and dozens of pages of information and perhaps one day I would be able to have the time to write a piece like the one on Summerland I recently linked to, but in the meantime if anyone wants to know more detail about the incident please let me know - I can certainly do extracts or pull out and write summaries,  not sure if I can actually send on the Inquest stuff 'as is' though as I needed the Coroner's permission for it and so don't want to abuse the privilege in case it is misused.

If other Public Record Office's are as helpful (& cheap as far as Research Assistants time is concerned) I may try and    get more info on other fires - Liverpool are useful in having their databases online so it is easy to pinpoint which records I need (& thus cheaper!)
Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36

Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2490
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2008, 10:01:32 PM »
The information has arrived & it's very detailed and has been of great use.

A Summary of the summary:

Construction

The store was over SB, B, G & 4 upper floors. Floor area based on frontage 76ft x 196ft

It comprised of the original store area from 1919 & altered in 1936 and an extension built in 1959.

The original building had a steel framed construction without protection, unsupporting walls and timber floors and joists with plaster ceilings directly applied to the timber. Floors were further lined with decorative timber blocks, plastic tiles or carpeting

The extension was similar, except that the steel frame and beams were encased in concrete to give 2hrs FR for external columns & beams and 1hr FR for internal beams & columns. where new & old columns were side by side, both were encased in concrete. Floors were of 1hr FR concrete with similar lining of tiles to the original.

Stairs

An escalator opened through all floors with no protection or fire shutters.

Two stairs were present at opposite ends of the floor.

In the original wing a 3'6"  timber staircase originally unenclosed, but in 1956 enclosed using 3" x 2" timber studding and 6mm plywood sheeting to each face sprayed with fire retardant. (It was planned to replace the stair with a concrete stair with brick enclosure in the near future). The stair had self closing doors at each level, but these were fitted with cabin hooks and were regularly hooked open for ventilation. Another factor was that the whole stair was not enclosed as a shaft - each flight was separately enclosed so that you had to travel across each open floor space for a few metres to reach the next enclosed flight down.

The second stair was a 4' concrete stair fully enclosed as a shaft in brick with self closing doors at each landing onto the main shop floor.

Shafts

A brick lift shaft capable of accommodating three lifts was included - two lifts with imperforate metal doors were within, the third part of the shaft had been converted to storerooms with timber flooring. In one cormer a similar brick shaft contained a goods lift with imperforate metal doors.

A brick services shaft and small apertures for cables and ventilation ducting was also present.

Internal division

Floors were open plan and where subdivisions were present for stockrooms, fitting rooms, etc they were timber stud and plywood with glazing & plastic cladding where required and were to false ceiling level only.

false Ceilings

The false ceiling was added in 1956 throughout the store suspended by timber battens to 2'6" depth (3'6" on the 3rd floor to accomodate water and waste pipes from the 4th floor kitchen). 2' x 2' "Whitelite" fibreboard tiles were used, with fire retardant finish to the underside only. At intervals plastic troughs for light fittings were present.

At the end of the store where the ventilation ducting and grilles were fitted the ceiling was 12" lower and of incombustible Burgess acoustic tiles (perforated 24swg zinc coated steel with rockwool padding). Timber planks remained above to allow workmen access.

Electrical

Through these ceilings ran power cables and from each floors distribution board was fed by 0.6 sq in twin core, paper insulated, lead lined, steel armoured cables. MICC was used from the floor's board to individual sockets and fittings, etc.

Active fire Precautions

Fire Alarm

No fire alarm in the modern sense was fitted. However each floor had a single 240v motorised bell (two to the 4th floor to cover the kitchen) connected to a switch in the telephone exchange in the nearby Hendersons Admin building (connected via an underground tunnel). The exchange had to be rung from the stores internal phones to enable the bells to be sounded & an external call made to the Fire Brigade.

As part of modernisation an AFA 240V fire alarm system was being fitted with heat detectors to all floors and the larger 3rd floor ceiling void connected to the already in service system in the Admin block to share it's GPO link to  Hatton Garden Fire Station. Unfortunately the fire occurred 1 week before it's commissioning.

Fire Fighting

The transformer room for the store was in the nearby Admin block & had a CO2 system (but all the doors were vented without asbestos curtains & so had no integrity). Other than that a suitable quantity of 2 gallon break bottle Soda acid and water/gas extinguishers & 2 gallon water buckets were located through the store. The kitchen had a 2 gallon Chemical Foam & an asbestos blanket, the lift motor rooms two 5lb CO2's

Emergency lighting

A 110V central battery system was provided covering the whole premises on local circuit failure

Training & Fire Drill

No fire training or instruction was given. No fire procedure existed even in a rudimentary form. This applied across the chain that owned Hendersons (House of Fraser)  despite similar chains having such in place.

The Fire

Wednesday 22nd June 1960, after 1400.

Approximately 100 staff & 100 customers in the premises

The twin core Cabling from the distribution board at the North of the floor above the false ceiling began to arc internally or similar and in any event built up a large amount of heat that caused the frame of the false ceiling to ignite by radiation, and rapidly spreading throughout the whole false ceiling (the material of these tiles and supporting battens was dried out and already warm from high temperatures in the store due to the ventilation system being partly out of order - this is why the stair doors were hooked open).

Conditions in the void soon led to flashover into the wooden fire stair, rendering it impassible to those on the 4th floor.

Between 1414 & 1420 molten lead from the cable showered down the service shaft to the 1st floor where workmen were laying lino in the switchroom. One went up to the upper floors as they thought it was a welder and wanted them to stop as the lino was being scorched. At 1420 the fire was discovered by 3rd floor staff and the General Manager (GM) who first heard a crackling and then saw flames through the holes in the acoustic tiles.

The GM rang the switchboard in the Admin block & told them to call 999. He then used the first of 9 water extinguishers. (all were ineffective as the jet splashed back off the tiles). The switchboard rang back & asked if the fire bells were to be activated. The GM said yes & the bells sounded throughout the building without any premature failure (as in other fires).

Several other staff & workmen helped with extinguishers and the GM went down to meet the FB. Orderly evacuation of the 1st & 2nd floors was in progress. He went back up the the 3rd, noticing burning droplets from the tiles falling down the escalator shaft. The floor was rapidly smoke logging and he told remaining staff to escape. He was going to check the 4th, but with the worsening fire and the arrival on the 3rd floor of firemen decided to leave the job to the FB.

Around this time the fire had flashed over, with false ceiling collapse causing the 3rd floor to become well alight and trapping several people on the 4th.

5 people had to escape onto a ledge through windows, including ventilation engineers who had been trapped after taking time to go back into the store to shut off the one working ventilator as smoke was being drawn through it. All were rescued by either TL or crawling to adjoining buildings save one who slipped and fell onto the canopy at ground level suffering fatal injuries.

10 people died from smoke inhalation as they had gone to the stair knocked out by the flashover & couldn't make the alternative in time.

5 Pump Escapes, 15 Major Pumps, 5 TLs, 1 Control Unit, Emergency Tender, & Hose Layer used 65 hydrants, 11 jets, 5 TL monitors, 6 twin jets & 1.5 million gallons of water over 3.5 hrs were used to control the fire

Firefighting was defensive as the spread of smoke and then flame forced firefighters out of the building within the first 10-15 minutes of te fire starting.

A partial internal collapse occurred during the fire & at one point bulging in the unsupporting walls threatened external collapse onto fire fighters.


irony
Only a week or so later a fire occurred in the Admin block of Hendersons. Due to the AFA fire detection system the alarm was quickly raised and the premises evacuated in 3 minutes and due to the protected stairways, concrete floors and frame cladding, the fire was limited in spread and controlled with no loss of life or injury





Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36

Offline Wiz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1591
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2008, 03:22:42 PM »
Thanks AnthonyB. Very interesting.

I'm amazed at the types of building materials used and the lack of fire compatmentation in the 60's.

The second fire mentioned shows the importance of a working fire alarm system.

Can any 'sparkys' out there confirm what the metric equivalent of a 0.6 q. inch cable is?

Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2490
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2008, 09:48:20 PM »
Although there was enough doubt for the inquest not to give a definite cause, the view supported by the Crowns electrical expert was that internal heating & arcing occurred because the cable was angled/bent beyond it's design limit, damaging most of the 10 layers of paper insulation, the last one carbonising and the arc striking.

Other experts favoured an unknown external heat source causing cable failure, but no specific cause was agreed upon.

Some of the cabling in the above photo is the 0.6 sq inch twin core.

I have more photos (well over 100) and the detailed electrical fault hypotheses (which do get very technical)
Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36

Offline Galeon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
  • Dont ask me on here for advice , come down the Pub
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2008, 10:20:37 PM »
Can any 'sparkys' out there confirm what the metric equivalent of a 0.6 q. inch cable is?

Don't quote me on this but that would put it at 16mm , that is assuming we are talking about a paper lead armoured cable. If that is the case you might have copper conductor , but it could even been aluminum , don't know how old this cable was , but when shortages around the world dictated it changed from copper to ali .
Was on a job once where ali was used but the guy calculated the loads , volt drop on copper , you need a bigger ali cable than copper for conductor size.
The cable construction would be lead , them layers of paper which were compacted with grease .
The joint/ termination of gland would be effectively sweated , and most definitely the outer sheath would have been used as the earth conductor.
Had the pleasure of working on this type of cable where we extended off to PVC so you almost had to be a plumber as well as a spark .
In relation to bends you almost had to sweep them into its final position .
The cable was o.k as long as you didn't play around with it to much , last dealings I had with this cable was a trip to Bermondsey , being a good boy recycling it , in the late 80's before it was trendy to go green.  (Beer money)
Maybe if there is any sparks who worked for the Electricity Board they might elaborate on the cable make up for us .
Its time to make a counter attack !

Offline kurnal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6489
    • http://www.peakland-fire-safety.co.uk
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2008, 07:57:28 AM »
Quote from: Wiz
Can any 'sparkys' out there confirm what the metric equivalent of a 0.6 q. inch cable is?
If its a direct conversion it would work out at 387.12 sq mm, dont know if thats how they do it cos I aint a sparky. But I have to do this sort of thing in my other job as a bar steward (in another place) for people who want me to measure out their drinks in fluid ounces (and pay for it in groats)

Offline Allen Higginson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1131
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2008, 09:21:18 AM »
I thought it was around 15/16mm as 0.6 is 3/5 of an inch and 3/5 of 25mm (approx. one inch) is 15mm.
I oould however be talking out my hat.

Offline John Webb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 838
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2008, 10:09:55 AM »
1sq in = 25.4mm X 25.4mm = 645.2 sq mm

So 0.6 sq in cable = 387 sq mm cable - heavy stuff!
 
Very unlikely to be aluminium cable - by the time that was in use we were on to PVC/SWA (steel wire armoured) cable rather than paper and lead.
John Webb
Consultant on Fire Safety, Diocese of St Albans
(Views expressed are my own)

Offline Wiz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1591
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2008, 04:48:56 PM »
John, surely, 387 mm2 can't be right mate!  A cable of such a size would be able to supply a whole town rather than just a floor of a department store!

I think Buzzard must be closer.

Offline Wiz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1591
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2008, 04:54:13 PM »
Quote from: Galeon
.... , volt drop on copper , you need a bigger ali cable than copper for conductor size.
This will be because aluminium will exhibit a higher electrical resistance than copper for the same cable length/conductor size. The higher the cable resistance for an equivalent current draw will result in a higher volt drop.

Offline kurnal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6489
    • http://www.peakland-fire-safety.co.uk
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2008, 08:33:27 PM »
Quote from: Wiz
John, surely, 387 mm2 can't be right mate!  A cable of such a size would be able to supply a whole town rather than just a floor of a department store!

I think Buzzard must be closer.
Tiz a mystery indeed. I agree with John that 387 sq mm is indeed 0.6 sq inch and would be a conductor of about 22mm diameter were we to take the direct conversion. I wonder if 0.6 sq inches relates to the size of the whole cable including sheath?

I shall have to be careful when on bar duty though in another place. If Buzz comes in for a pint I may well offer him 250ml.

Offline John Webb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 838
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2008, 09:31:25 AM »
I don't think the cable is excessive in size for a large departmental store. Bearing in mind that when open there are going to be a great number of lights on plus other loads, such as lifts and escalators, the load could be that of an otherwise small town!

The latest edition (17th) of the IEE Regs give the ratings for 630 sq mm cable, which seems to be a close match in size to what was in Hendersons:
Three phase AC Armoured cable clipped direct to wall is rated at 861 amps; on tray is rated at 935-992A depending on spacing.
Non-armoured cable: 1033 Amps to 1088 amps depending on circumstances.
(Both above are 3 separate single-core cables, one per phase.)
John Webb
Consultant on Fire Safety, Diocese of St Albans
(Views expressed are my own)

Offline Galeon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
  • Dont ask me on here for advice , come down the Pub
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2008, 02:15:45 PM »
Quote :Very unlikely to be aluminium cable - by the time that was in use we were on to PVC/SWA (steel wire armoured) cable rather than paper and lead.

So VIR vulcanised Indian Rubber cables (1960s & early 1970s) were all copper ?
Its time to make a counter attack !

Offline Wiz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1591
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2008, 08:43:25 PM »
Quote from: John_s.webb
I don't think the cable is excessive in size for a large departmental store. Bearing in mind that when open there are going to be a great number of lights on plus other loads, such as lifts and escalators, the load could be that of an otherwise small town!

The latest edition (17th) of the IEE Regs give the ratings for 630 sq mm cable, which seems to be a close match in size to what was in Hendersons:
Three phase AC Armoured cable clipped direct to wall is rated at 861 amps; on tray is rated at 935-992A depending on spacing.
Non-armoured cable: 1033 Amps to 1088 amps depending on circumstances.
(Both above are 3 separate single-core cables, one per phase.)
Thanks for this John. I was getting my diameters mixed up with my CSAs! I understand it now.

Offline AnthonyB

  • Firenet Extinguisher Expert
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2490
    • http://www.firewizard.co.uk
Hendersons Fire - new information
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2008, 11:37:15 PM »
Just to give you more to go on.....

Cable 'BC' where the fire originated had 240V running through it, but could carry up to 1100V, it was rated to 180/190 amps, with 30-35 amps actually through it and a 160 amp fuse.




Anthony Buck
Owner & Fire Safety Consultant at Fire Wizard


Extinguisher/Fire History Enthusiast

Fire Extinguisher Facebook Group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=65...415&ref=ts
http://www.youtube.com/user/contactacb
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/anthony-buck-36