I take it the doors formed a small lobby?
How far apart were the doors?
Did one door only have a self closer with them both relying on it?
Were they easily opened?
Did they close properly?
Sounds like a good idea, I think?
Sounds like it was a way to create double door protection to the single staircase building. Is it what was intended by the guys who wrote the initial guidance promoting this approach for life safety? I doubt it.
The use of two doors so close together is commonly used for compartmentation purposes- but smoke control is not critical to compartmentation. It is to life safety.
Two doors so close together and linked would
1-provide no opportunity for any smoke reservoir of any size at all in the lobby
2- if the doors were linked then if one was slightly ajar the other would also be ajar
3- provide no opportunity for a lobby to protect the stair as both doors are open at the same time as people pass through.
Whilst I am a firm believer in the benefits of double door protection if properly designed into the building from the outset, I hate to see contrived solutions to achieve it retrospectively. The creation of artificial lobbies ruins buildings and is usually ineffective. In my opinion of course.