Reasonable Adjustment v Reasonably Practicable

[Kelsall]

The equalities act requires 'reasonable adjustment' to allow access but once in the building the RRO requires the RP to get everyone out in the event of a fire.
Could a building owner restrict access on the grounds of what is 'reasonably practicable' in the event of fire? i.e. could they restrict wheelchair access to a limited number; if in the event of a fire they can't get more than one or two out safely.

[Mike Buckley]

The short answer is yes the owner can restrict access on those grounds. The issue runs on the precedence of the legislation which is based on the penalties imposed. The DDA only allows progress through the Civil Courts and the client can only be sued, however the RRO is dealt with by the Criminal Courts and the client can be fined and or imprisoned, therefore the RRO will take precedence.

The obvious arguement will be what is a reasonable adjustment?

[nearlythere]

The equalities act requires 'reasonable adjustment' to allow access but once in the building the RRO requires the RP to get everyone out in the event of a fire.

Public bodies seem to consider that "reasonable adjustment" means "must do" whereas in the real world, where there is a need for control over budgets, it is "can we"?

[jokar]

The main factor appaers to be finance.  If you have the money and do not make reasonable adjustments then it will cost you.