Author Topic: BS9999  (Read 10070 times)

Offline bilb27

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
BS9999
« on: May 07, 2014, 10:12:58 AM »
Morning everyone,

Looking for advice from all sides  :). Is it acceptable to complete a FRA using BS9999? And would Enforcing Officers for the Fire Service allow this and give advice based on that document.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Many Thanks.

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: BS9999
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2014, 10:53:20 AM »
Morning everyone,

Looking for advice from all sides  :). Is it acceptable to complete a FRA using BS9999? And would Enforcing Officers for the Fire Service allow this and give advice based on that document.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Many Thanks.
Why would you want to use BS9999 bilb?
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline Golden

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 486
Re: BS9999
« Reply #2 on: May 07, 2014, 10:54:48 AM »
Bilb 9999 is for the design, construction and use of buildings and can therefore be used to assess an occupied building therefore can be used for the purposes that you describe however its a bit complex to be basing FRAs upon in my opinion - although I do use some of the principles in 9999 when giving advice or in noting my significant findings.

As for giving advice the general consensus is that fire officers are reluctant to give specific advice as it may be misconstrued and there is case history to back this up - but they may give generic advice such as 'use BS9999'!

Offline bilb27

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: BS9999
« Reply #3 on: May 07, 2014, 11:01:22 AM »
Thanks for replies. I am just looking to see if it can be used. I can't think of a scenario where it would be used but reading the document it seems to indicate it can be used for that purpose.

I am also looking to see if any Fire Service Inspecting Officers have ever come across the situation where it has been used?

I have discussed with existing Fire Officers who have said that training is currently provided that it can be used and that they have given advice based on the guidance give in BS999 following Audits.


Offline Mike Buckley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1045
Re: BS9999
« Reply #4 on: May 07, 2014, 12:28:16 PM »
There are some scenarios where BS9999 could be used as guidance particularly using the Risk Profiles for travel distances particularly if there are sprinklers installed and for minimum standards of fire alarms. The chart for occupancy factors is also a lot more comprehensive than ADB.

However finally it all depends on the assessment of risk.
The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to those who think they've found it.

Offline Dinnertime Dave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 819
Re: BS9999
« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2014, 05:11:53 PM »
If the building has been designed using BS9999 then the fire risk assessment must take this into account. Otherwise you may struggle to justify the extended travel distance or increased occupancy numbers.

Offline kurnal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6489
    • http://www.peakland-fire-safety.co.uk
Re: BS9999
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2014, 06:01:50 PM »
It offers a design approach that goes part way towards fire engineering compared to the ADB. However it would be wrong to cherry pick  from BS9999 if carrying out an assessment of a building that was not specifically designed the that standard. But it is legit to use it as a benchmark alongside other  guidance  to inform your decision.

Offline Fishy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 777
Re: BS9999
« Reply #7 on: May 08, 2014, 08:42:43 AM »
 There is a whole section on Managing Fire Safety in BS 9999 - Section 9 so I see no reason why it wouldn't be applicable.  Why an occupier would wish to use this instead of the Government guidance that's freely available I'm not sure, but I don't see why you shouldn't.

At the end of the day it's potentially acceptable to complete a fire risk assessment referring to whatever you like - so long as you can demonstrate it's suitable and sufficient.

Offline colin todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
  • Civilianize enforcement -you know it makes sense.
    • http://www.cstodd.co.uk
Re: BS9999
« Reply #8 on: May 10, 2014, 09:10:56 PM »
It tends to be used by incompetent fire risk assessors to prove black is white or to hit poor unsuspecting fire officers over the head by cherry picking the bits they want.  Steer well clear of it.
Colin Todd, C S Todd & Associates

Offline lyledunn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 503
Re: BS9999
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2014, 03:12:30 PM »
I wonder how many incompetent assessor so use PAS 78?!

Offline kurnal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6489
    • http://www.peakland-fire-safety.co.uk
Re: BS9999
« Reply #10 on: June 02, 2014, 08:33:51 PM »
Lyle They would have to be really incompetent to use PAS78 ! ;)

Offline Golden

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 486
Re: BS9999
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2014, 08:42:56 PM »
Surely just having a risk assessment that is PAS must 'tick a box'?

Offline Dinnertime Dave

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 819
Re: BS9999
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2014, 08:54:54 PM »
PAS 78 - commissioning accessible websites, always a good read.

Sorry I googled it to see if it even existed.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2014, 06:21:28 AM by Dinnertime Dave »

Offline lyledunn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 503
Re: BS9999
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2014, 07:12:22 AM »
  You might also want to make reference to PAS70 and PAS77 which are both exclusively about the competent use of oversized digits on mini-tablets when making reference to the best general fire risk assessment guidance available!

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
Re: BS9999
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2014, 07:23:04 AM »
  You might also want to make reference to PAS70 and PAS77 which are both exclusively about the competent use of oversized digits on mini-tablets when making reference to the best general fire risk assessment guidance available!
Riveting read Lyle.
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.