Many will have seen Colin Todd's avatar statement "civilianise enforcement-you know it makes sense".
Does it? I thought it might be interesting to explore this.
The first assumption though is that fire services will remain the authority responsible for enforcing fire safety legislation in the UK.
If this is to be the case then I wager that most fire services already employ non operational staff (ie civilians? every member of the Fire Service is actually a civilian within the meaning of the word.)
in the role of inspecting officer and in fire engineering roles.
Presently very many Inspecting Officers are former operational staff re-employed on artificially low salaries as they are in receipt of a fire service pension. But they are all getting pretty long in the tooth and the changes to the pension scheme mean that they are a diminishing resource.
I contend that the best, most qualified and experienced inspecting officers come from an operational background where they will have experienced at first hand the very hazard that they are employed to protect relevant persons from.
They will have experienced thousands of fire situations and will understand the characteristics of fire in all its stages.
They will have witnessed and managed human behaviour in fire situations.
They will have experience in investigating the cause of fire.
They will have experienced at first hand the toxicity aspects of fire and smoke.
They will have an understanding of firefighting in high rise buildings and the importance of siting risers, shafts and ventilation and providing access for firefighting.
They will have experienced at first hand the effect of fire on the elements of construction and understand the protection afforded by walls, doors, ceilings, floors, shutters etc.
They will have witnessed the benefits and operation of fixed installations and sprinklers in a fire situation.
The system was working well up to the mid 1990s and was well supported by a structured range of training courses at the National Training Centres. These courses provided for all management levels and were reinforced by competence measures - the Station Officers and IFE exams included fire safety papers.
It all started to go wrong with the implementation of the Workplace Fire Safety Regulations because Inspecting Officers were faced with two very different regimes for the same buildings at the same time. The Regulations were based on risk assessment whilst at the same time the Fire Precautions Act guidance and enforcement were extremely prescriptive especially for certificated buildings. So Inspecting Officers, who should have had the best of training for dealing with such a different and dual approach were let down by CACFOA and most Fire Services by a decision to provide minimalistic internal risk assessment training within each Service and most senior officers, -those responsible for signing off fire certificates- felt they were above such training and continued to insist on the prescriptive standards under the FP Act.
I would love to expand on this and the subsequent role of New Labour, Sir George Bain, CFOA and CFOs in general in wrecking a good system but it might be wise to keep my counsel.
But as Colin rightly points out having broken the old system it is unlikely to be reinstated, and the changed priorities and focus on different output measures and performance indicators means that any talk of additional funding would be a pipe dream. So when the pool of current IOs finally retires the only options are:
Privatise enforcement by selling the right to enforce?
Recruit and train non operational staff to the role of Inspecting Officer?
Make another body (eg local authority EHOs) responsible?
There are no zero cost options. There is also the question of how the essential underpinning knowledge will be delivered, experience gained and competence measured under a new regime.
Many brigades are already employing non operational staff to the role. Their training appears to comprise a 4 day NEBOSH fire module as part of the Gen Cert, and a weeks basic course at the College. But no experience of real fires, historic building codes, Building Regulations etc.
One thing is certain- many fire brigades will soon run out of competent experienced IOs as my peers retire and something needs to be done to ensure continuity. Any thoughts anybody?