Doors without intumescent strips and just 25mm stops were found in experiments during the 80's to suffer from pyrolysis of the door edges creating substantial thick heavy smoke that layered under corridor detectors so they wouldn't trigger. This led in part to the 1988 revision of BS5839 introducing Life safety & Property protection detection categories with the minimum life cover being detectors in rooms opening onto escape routes as the escape routes (escape route only cover being the usual before then)
This in part is no doubt why intumescent strips became standard as well as cold smoke seals, as whilst the traditional doors gave a reasonable degree of protection they were a long way from perfect (see the test videos on Youtube showing a fire doorset without seals next to one with them, lots of smoke and hot gases around the edges from relatively early on).
As has been said for an intumescent to fully activate the conditions on at least one side are usually lethal and you wouldn't want to open it. Even firefighter's have to proceed with care as even with PPE & RPE they aren't invulnerable, especially for exposure to extreme heat for any length of time, nor from backdraughts by randomly opening doors.
If the drawbacks outweighed the benefits we've had over 30 years to find this out and I've not heard any serious objections.