Author Topic: No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers  (Read 19790 times)

Offline Thomas Brookes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #15 on: September 08, 2008, 03:26:07 PM »
Quote from: FSO
Quote from: Thomas Brookes
I would put a complaint into his Chief Fire Officer, they are not above the law and the RRO does recomend extinguishers as a means of controlling a small fire.
Really?

Where?
If you look at the RRO it says very little about very little, how ever if you read the goverment guides on the RRO Sleeping Accomadation on page 22 it states on fire fighting equipment that "Fire fighting equipment can reduce the risk of a small fire developing into a large one etc" then later states that "the equipment will need to comprise enough portable extinguishers that must be suitable for the risk".

Unfortunately as per normal actual goverment orders and acts are vague to say the least and normally need another reference book to go with them.
I refuse to have a battle of wittts with an unarmed person.

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2008, 03:34:20 PM »
Quote from: Thomas Brookes
Quote from: FSO
Quote from: Thomas Brookes
I would put a complaint into his Chief Fire Officer, they are not above the law and the RRO does recomend extinguishers as a means of controlling a small fire.
Really?

Where?
If you look at the RRO it says very little about very little, how ever if you read the goverment guides on the RRO Sleeping Accomadation on page 22 it states on fire fighting equipment that "Fire fighting equipment can reduce the risk of a small fire developing into a large one etc" then later states that "the equipment will need to comprise enough portable extinguishers that must be suitable for the risk".

Unfortunately as per normal actual goverment orders and acts are vague to say the least and normally need another reference book to go with them.
Thomas. Recommendations and requirements are two different things.
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline Thomas Brookes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2008, 09:55:24 PM »
I agree, how ever a fire officer saying because a building has sprinklers it does not need any fire extinguishers or other equipment or services is a complete nonsense.

I would, and have made formal complaints over this sort of poor information given out by Poorly Informed Fire Officers, the last one went as far as the Dep-Primeministers Office and ended with a Countys Fire Services Risk Managers having take re training & a massive climb down by the County's Chief Fire Officer and over 200 business owners being written to describing how the information given out was incorrect. Unfortunately so many fire industry people just accept everything the fire officers say as being correct, and no matter how well meaning their advice is sometimes they are wrong. "but saying that we all can be wrong sometimes"
I refuse to have a battle of wittts with an unarmed person.

Offline SidM

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #18 on: September 10, 2008, 04:37:36 PM »
Article 13(4) & 13(5) covers what?  Let's not engage in pedantry.  The Order requires FFE and requires training to use it.
"We are the unwilling,
Led by the unqualified,
Doing the unnecessary,
For the ungrateful.
-Living the dream!"

Offline SidM

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #19 on: September 10, 2008, 04:46:16 PM »
Quote from: FSO
Sleeping for naughty little boys.

 Brand new build, L1 system, smoke extraction, full sprinkler coverage, fire blanket in kitchens and 1 extinguisher in staff office.

Sleeps about 10, fairly large building with day resources a few staff always on site.

Extinguishers in place would be constantly discharged by naughty boys.
Article 4(f)(ii) talks about measures to mitigate the effects of fire and if they can't stop the naughty boys then their management has to be called into question and if that's the case then that's a contravention of another Article.
"We are the unwilling,
Led by the unqualified,
Doing the unnecessary,
For the ungrateful.
-Living the dream!"

Offline jokar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1472
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #20 on: September 10, 2008, 05:58:14 PM »
SidM, no it does not.  It states "Where Necessary" in Article 13 for fire fighting equipment, warning and detection and anything else you wish to add.  The definition of this term is in the Glossary at the back of each of the 11 premises guides.  This means that if the outcomes of an FRA decides that it is not necessary then it does not have to be provided.

Offline Paul2886

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #21 on: September 10, 2008, 08:25:51 PM »
Quote from: jokar
SidM, no it does not.  It states "Where Necessary" in Article 13 for fire fighting equipment, warning and detection and anything else you wish to add.  The definition of this term is in the Glossary at the back of each of the 11 premises guides.  This means that if the outcomes of an FRA decides that it is not necessary then it does not have to be provided.
Have difficulty with that one. Setting the common areas of flats aside give an example of a situation where extinguishers would not be needed. Sprinklers in an office block is certainly not one.

Offline SidM

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #22 on: September 11, 2008, 10:32:36 AM »
Quote from: jokar
SidM, no it does not.  It states "Where Necessary" in Article 13 for fire fighting equipment, warning and detection and anything else you wish to add.  The definition of this term is in the Glossary at the back of each of the 11 premises guides.  This means that if the outcomes of an FRA decides that it is not necessary then it does not have to be provided.
In other words you can, as I have seen, use risk assessment to develop spurious arguments and dispense with Articles 13, 14, 15 & 17.  If that's the case, what is the point of having legislation and an enforcing authority or the courts for that matter.

Put differently, the risk assessment would have to provide a jolly good justification as to a why a measure was unnecessary and if it went to court, I wonder who would be "listened" to.  Would it be the enforcing authority or some individual with a spurious argument in a risk assessment?
"We are the unwilling,
Led by the unqualified,
Doing the unnecessary,
For the ungrateful.
-Living the dream!"

Offline CivvyFSO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #23 on: September 11, 2008, 11:29:02 AM »
If an argument is spurious then we should have no difficulty in challenging it, and also by creating that spurious argument their risk assessment would be deemed as not suitable and sufficient, to add to the other failings. In some ways the whole fact they were aware of a problem and have made a poor excuse to avoid doing anything about it could easily go against them in a court.

There is a common misconception that you can "risk assess" all sorts of problems away. You cannot risk assess a problem away, you can justify that it is not actually the problem that it seems to be, but a piece of paper with lies/excuses on does not make a premises safe.

Offline SidM

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #24 on: September 11, 2008, 11:56:07 AM »
Quote from: CivvyFSO
If an argument is spurious then we should have no difficulty in challenging it, and also by creating that spurious argument their risk assessment would be deemed as not suitable and sufficient, to add to the other failings. In some ways the whole fact they were aware of a problem and have made a poor excuse to avoid doing anything about it could easily go against them in a court.

There is a common misconception that you can "risk assess" all sorts of problems away. You cannot risk assess a problem away, you can justify that it is not actually the problem that it seems to be, but a piece of paper with lies/excuses on does not make a premises safe.
I've read risk assessments which basically state that there is going to be no problem in this area because there is no ignition source and no problem in this area because there's nothing to burn.  Although it is a very basic argument, it is one a lot of people make to justify why a measure is not necessary.
"We are the unwilling,
Led by the unqualified,
Doing the unnecessary,
For the ungrateful.
-Living the dream!"

Offline FSO

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #25 on: September 11, 2008, 01:21:01 PM »
I suppose you want FFE in common areas of purpose built flats then?

Offline CivvyFSO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #26 on: September 11, 2008, 02:10:47 PM »

Offline nearlythere

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #27 on: September 11, 2008, 02:31:35 PM »
Quote from: Paulm2886
Quote from: jokar
SidM, no it does not.  It states "Where Necessary" in Article 13 for fire fighting equipment, warning and detection and anything else you wish to add.  The definition of this term is in the Glossary at the back of each of the 11 premises guides.  This means that if the outcomes of an FRA decides that it is not necessary then it does not have to be provided.
Have difficulty with that one. Setting the common areas of flats aside give an example of a situation where extinguishers would not be needed. Sprinklers in an office block is certainly not one.
In a block built tin roofed storage facility for keeping milk bottles in metal crates, a brick store, a water tank store, an empty store and a premises where the employer has told all of his staff that the only action that they should take if they discover a fire is to sound the alarm, evacuate to the assembly point and stay put. The Fire & Rescue Service will then be called to extinguish the fire.
We're not Brazil we're Northern Ireland.

Offline SidM

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #28 on: September 11, 2008, 03:34:28 PM »
Quote from: nearlythere
Quote from: Paulm2886
Quote from: jokar
SidM, no it does not.  It states "Where Necessary" in Article 13 for fire fighting equipment, warning and detection and anything else you wish to add.  The definition of this term is in the Glossary at the back of each of the 11 premises guides.  This means that if the outcomes of an FRA decides that it is not necessary then it does not have to be provided.
Have difficulty with that one. Setting the common areas of flats aside give an example of a situation where extinguishers would not be needed. Sprinklers in an office block is certainly not one.
In a block built tin roofed storage facility for keeping milk bottles in metal crates, a brick store, a water tank store, an empty store and a premises where the employer has told all of his staff that the only action that they should take if they discover a fire is to sound the alarm, evacuate to the assembly point and stay put. The Fire & Rescue Service will then be called to extinguish the fire.
Articles 8-22 apply to relevant persons none of which would be present in a store excpet to pick up the milk, which would take about 2 seconds.  That has to be one of very limited excpetions.
"We are the unwilling,
Led by the unqualified,
Doing the unnecessary,
For the ungrateful.
-Living the dream!"

Offline Dragonmaster

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
No need for fire extinguishers cos we've got sprinklers
« Reply #29 on: September 11, 2008, 04:54:51 PM »
Quote from: jokar
SidM, no it does not.  It states "Where Necessary" in Article 13 for fire fighting equipment, warning and detection and anything else you wish to add.  The definition of this term is in the Glossary at the back of each of the 11 premises guides.  This means that if the outcomes of an FRA decides that it is not necessary then it does not have to be provided.
Far be it for me to argue with Jokar, my interpretation of Article 13's 'where necessary' is that FFE should be provided, and then the RA would decide what type and how many etc. As i've said before, without FFE, how do you comply with Article 8 - provision of GFP's and then Article 4(f)(ii) - measure to mitigate the effects of fire i.e. the assumption in Article 8 that a fire will occur?

Phew! By the way, it's good to be back on the forum since i've now finished being knocked of my very fast motorbike (obituary for the bike to follow!)
"Never do today what will become someone's else's responsibility tomorrow"