well, things have certainly been developing while ive been busy doing other things!!
ok, the comments from colin were i believe meant for me, and not as an attack on others, if i were offended by colin i would tell him and im sure he would respond appropriately, the other comments re those employed by a fire authority or a private enterprise or consultancy really need putting into some sort of context, people are people and most people (of an age between 17 and 60) are generally employees, so i have respect for all of them. i also have respect for employers that treat their employees and others decently, so i'd be happy to see a bit more of that on here??
back to the real issue, there is work developing as i type, a sub group is working on role allocation and job sizing which may start to put some flesh on the bones of the june and october agreements. specialist posts will be considered and we are trying to establish how 'weighting' should be applied, it isnt all about the numbers of people that a manager manages. we have some views on this issue and they are shared by those within the group, if anyone has any contributions to that debate then by all means post on here - which was why this thread was 'started', there have been comments about this process being kept 'shrouded in secrecy', the answer to that is quite simple, we have all experienced people rushing off in all directions and acting on snippets and their own interpretations, we are trying to avoid all this, so i certainly dont apologise.
so as i said, please add your comments on the issue of role allocation and weighting of specialist posts (activities to be more accurate)
thanks
dave bev